The Mercury News

Don’t cater to old stereotype­s with ladies-only snack foods

- By Esther J. Cepeda Esther Cepeda is a Washington Post columnist.

Recently, on economist Stephen J. Dubner’s fantastic “Freakonomi­cs” podcast, PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi implied that the company would soon be introducin­g womanfrien­dly snacks, because gals approach their savory snacking differentl­y than guys.

“When you eat out of … one of our single-serve bags, especially as you watch a lot of the young guys eat the chips, they love their Doritos, and they lick their fingers with great glee, and when they reach the bottom of the bag, they pour the little broken pieces into their mouth, because they don’t want to lose that taste of the flavor and the broken chips in the bottom,” Nooyi told Dubner.

In my household, the young man who is the secondary eater of Fritos, Cheetos, Lays potato chips and nacho-cheese flavored Doritos (I hold the dubious honor of being the primary eater of this delicious junk) makes quite the theater of licking fingers and lip smacking until the motherly stink-eye quells his culinary clamor.

Nooyi continues: “Women, I think, would love to do the same, but they don’t. They don’t like to crunch too loudly in public. And they don’t lick their fingers generously and they don’t like to pour the little broken pieces and the flavor into their mouth.”

OK, I will grant Nooyi this: When eating my treats, I don’t make a loud, rude spectacle of myself the way a child would. But let’s be clear: The skull-rattling crunch of Cheetos or Fritos, for instance, is more than half the appeal. And though you won’t see me pouring the salty crumbs down my gullet, trust me, those delicious little pieces never go to waste.

Dubner asked Nooyi if there were male and female versions of chips that the company was toying with, and she responded, “It’s not a ‘male and female’ as much as ‘Are there snacks for women that can be designed and packaged differentl­y?’ And yes, we are looking at it, and we’re getting ready to launch a bunch of them soon. For women, lowcrunch, the full taste profile, not have so much of the flavor stick on the fingers, and how can you put it in your purse? Because women love to carry a snack in their purse.”

Oh, Indra, noooooo! I don’t know whether I’m more offended that she thinks women worry about making reasonable chewing sounds when they eat — or that she thinks I carry a purse.

A snack in the purse? Sure, if you’re a mom of preschool-age children. But could the stereotype­s get any staler? Plenty of lady types don’t carry portable pantries.

These are not just the indignant rantings of an unadorned woman with too many salty snacks in the kitchen cupboard.

Women across the globe took to the internet to mock the idea of “Lady Doritos” to the point that PepsiCo had to contradict Nooyi. A spokespers­on told media outlets: “We already have Doritos for women — they’re called Doritos, and they’re enjoyed by millions of people every day. At the same time, we know needs and preference­s continue to evolve and we’re always looking for new ways to engage and delight our consumers.”

Nooyi flew awfully close to the sun when overgenera­lizing about a segment of the population that is responsibl­e for more than $20 trillion in worldwide spending, a significan­t portion of which ends up in the chip cupboard at home.

For the umpteenth time, marketers, please stop seeing women as exotic, inscrutabl­e and borderline inhuman consumers who need to be pandered to in the most reductive, surface-level ways.

If snack companies really want to impress the ladies, they ought to think of women simply as lovers of food — and leave the manners to us.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States