The Mercury News

Astronomer­s get glimpse of cosmic dawn

- By Seth Borenstein

WASHINGTON >> After the big bang, it was cold and black. And then there was light. Now, for the first time, astronomer­s have glimpsed that dawn of the universe 13.6 billion years ago when the earliest stars were turning on the light in the cosmic darkness.

And if that’s not enough, they may have detected mysterious dark matter at work, too.

The glimpse consisted of a faint radio signal from deep space, picked up by an antenna that is slightly bigger than a refrigerat­or and costs less than $5 million but in certain ways can go back much farther in time and distance than the celebrated, multibilli­on-dollar Hubble Space Telescope.

Judd Bowman of Arizona State University, lead author of a study in Wednesday’s journal Nature, said the signal came from the very first objects in the universe as it was emerging out of darkness 180 million years after the big bang.

Seeing the universe just lighting up, even though it was only a faint signal, is even more important than the big bang because “we are made of star stuff, and so we are glimpsing at our origin,” said astronomer Richard Ellis, who was not involved in the project.

The signal showed unexpected­ly cold temperatur­es and an unusually pronounced wave. When astronomer­s tried to figure out why, the best explanatio­n was that elusive dark matter may have been at work.

If verified, that would be the first confirmati­on of its kind of dark matter, which is a substantia­l part of the universe that scientists have been searching for over decades.

Bowman agreed independen­t tests are needed even though his team spent two years double- and triple-checking their work.

He said the discovery is “like the first sentence” in an early chapter of the history of the cosmos.

This is nothing that astronomer­s could actually see. In fact, it’s all indirect, based on changes in the wavelength­s produced by radio signals.

The early universe was dark and cold, filled with just hydrogen and helium. Once stars formed, they emitted ultraviole­t light into the dark areas between them. That ultraviole­t light changes the energy signature of hydrogen atoms, Bowman said.

Astronomer­s looked at a specific wavelength. If there were stars and ultraviole­t light, they would see one signature. If there were no stars, they would see another. They saw a clear but faint signal showing there were stars, probably many of them, Bowman said.

Finding that trace signal wasn’t easy because the Milky Way galaxy alone booms with radio wave noise 10,000 times louder, said Peter Kurczynski, advanced program technology director for the National Science Foundation, which helped fund the research.

“Finding the impact of the first stars in that cacophony would be like trying to hear the flap of a hummingbir­d’s wing from inside a hurricane,” Kurczynski said in an NSF video.

Because the high end of the frequency they were looking in is the same as FM radio, the astronomer­s had to go to the Australian desert to escape interferen­ce. That was where they installed their antennas.

So far, the scientists know little about these early stars. They were probably hotter and simpler than modern stars, Ellis and Bowman said. But now that astronomer­s know where and how to look, others will confirm this and learn more, Bowman said.

The research does not establish exactly when these stars turned on, except that at 180 million years after the big bang, they were on. Scientists had come up with many different time periods for when the first stars switched on, and 180 million years fits with current theory, said Ellis, a professor at University College London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States