The Mercury News

EPA sets up fight over car goals

Move threatens to strip California of ability under Clean Air Act to set stricter emissions standards

- By Evan Halper

The Trump administra­tion openly threatened one of the cornerston­es of California’s environmen­tal protection­s Monday, saying that it may revoke the state’s ability under the Clean Air Act to impose stricter standards than the federal government sets for vehicle emissions.

The announceme­nt came as the administra­tion confirmed it is tearing up landmark fuel economy rules pushing automakers to manufactur­e cleaner burning cars and SUVs.

“Cooperativ­e federalism doesn’t mean that one state can dictate standards for the rest of the country,” Environmen­tal Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt said in a statement.

“EPA will set a national standard for greenhouse gas emissions that allows auto manufactur­ers to make cars that people both want and can afford — while still expanding environmen­tal and safety benefits of newer cars. It’s in everyone’s best interest to have a national standard, and we look forward to working with all states, including California, as we work to finalize that standard.”

The threat against California’s decades-old independen­t authority on clean air rules came on the same day that the administra­tion filed suit to try to overturn another of the state’s environmen­tal protection­s — a measure passed last year by the Legislatur­e that seeks to limit the federal government’s ability to sell public lands to private interests by requiring that the state be given a right of first refusal on federal land sales within California’s borders.

The Justice Department asked a federal court in Sacramento to overturn the state law, saying it interfered with Congress’ constituti­onal power to dispose of federal property.

Together, the two moves marked another es-

calation of the battle between the state and federal government­s over environmen­tal policies.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in an interview with the Bay Area News Group editorial board that she expected Pruitt would attempt to revoke California’s waiver to set its own fuel standards.

“I think he’ll try,” Feinstein said. If he does, “We should make a huge fuss, the biggest fuss we can.”

The fuel standards that the Trump administra­tion is targeting are “what’s going to get us the biggest bang for the buck in terms of automobile efficiency,” Feinstein said. “This is done based on technology and available science, and he wants to cancel that out.”

“The years of litigation and investment uncertaint­y will be far harder on the auto industry than simply living up to the fuel economy standards they once embraced,” Feinstein also warned in a statement.

“The EPA is willfully ignoring the fact that these emission standards are working. Cars are becoming more fuel-efficient and consumers are saving money at the pump. … Right now, car manufactur­ers are on target to exceed 40 mpg by 2020 and 50 mpg by 2025. There simply is no reason to roll back that progress.”

Gov. Jerry Brown blasted the federal statement on auto emission rules as a “belated April Fools’ Day trick.”

“This cynical and meretricio­us abuse of power will poison our air and jeopardize the health of all Americans,” the governor said in a statement.

Pruitt’s announceme­nt said that the administra­tion will abandon the federal goal of having vehicles average 55 mpg by 2025. That target will be replaced with a weaker fuel economy standard that the administra­tion will settle on at a later date.

The action sets up the administra­tion for a confrontat­ion with California and a dozen other states that use the state’s emissions standards. Under the Clean Air Act, California is the only state that can independen­tly adopt its own emissions standards, but other states can then adopt them. Several of the states that have done so have vowed to defy the administra­tion’s effort to weaken mileage standards.

“We’re ready to file suit if needed to protect these critical standards and to fight the administra­tion’s war on our environmen­t. California didn’t become the sixth largest economy in the world by spectating,” state Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement.

The current national fuel economy targets, which were championed by California and adopted by the Obama administra­tion, represent the single biggest action the federal government has taken to curb greenhouse gases. They are crucial for California and other states to meet their goals for climate action and to reduce smog and other air pollution.

The targets are also essential to an effort led by Brown and others to carry the country toward meeting the obligation­s in the Paris accord on climate change that the Trump administra­tion is refusing to honor. The administra­tion’s action came at the behest of automakers, which say that the 55 mpg standard will impose too heavy a cost.

But an all-out fight between the federal and state government­s over California’s power to set emissions standards could backfire on the automakers. Pruitt’s legal ability to revoke California’s authority is uncertain, and any such move could be tied up in court for years.

In the meantime, auto companies would be faced with the complicate­d and costly prospect of building and selling two different sets of cars — one for California and the other states that follow its standards, and one for the rest of the country.

The resisting states account for more than a third of all car sales, making it difficult — if not impossible — for automakers to take advantage of looser rules if those states don’t go along. Although automakers have been hopeful some deal could be brokered, perhaps with California agreeing to weaken the more immediate targets in exchange for federal buy-in to more aggressive goals through 2030, that is looking increasing­ly unlikely.

 ??  ?? Feinstein
Feinstein

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States