The Mercury News

President Trump got played by the North Korean leader Kim Jong Un

- By Trudy Rubin Philadelph­ia Inquirer Trudy Rubin is a Philadelph­ia Inquirer columnist. © 2018, Chicago Tribune. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

President Donald Trump got played.

After all the hoopla and pageantry and Trump braggadoci­o at the Singapore summit, with Kim Jong Un standing alongside the U.S. president in front of thousands of journalist­s, the North Korean leader came out the winner.

Kim racked up points just by standing beside the U.S. president as an equal, showered with Trump’s praise and transforme­d from pariah to internatio­nal star. In recent weeks he was welcomed to Beijing and Seoul, and invited to Moscow. China and Russia have already started to loosen sanctions.

All this might have been an acceptable cost for achieving the U.S. goal: to get Kim to commit specifical­ly to shedding his nuclear weapons within a reasonable time frame, in a verifiable fashion.

But, on this, Trump failed big time: The joint statement that emerged from the summit included no firm commitment­s, using vague language on denucleari­zation that is interprete­d very differentl­y by the two sides. “It does not meet the minimum requiremen­ts in terms of what we expected them to do,” Ambassador Joseph Y. Yun, the former special U.S. representa­tive to North Korea, told CNN.

Trump made a huge concession up front — stopping joint U.S. military exercises with South Korea, key for keeping pressure on the North. And he didn’t even inform the Seoul government beforehand.

“I gave up nothing,” the president insisted, clearly oblivious to the fact that he was playing into North Korea’s longtime game plan: to emerge as an internatio­nally recognized state, recognized by America and the world — without surrenderi­ng all of its nukes.

In the run-up to the summit, U.S. and Korean negotiator­s were wrestling over whether North Korea would make a substantia­l pledge of denucleari­zation up front, including details of its nuclear program and a timeline for dismantlin­g it.

But the two sides could not even agree on a common definition of denucleari­zation.

“Our definition of denucleari­zation is they give up all their fissile material, facilities, nuclear material taken out, irrevocabl­y and verifiably,” says Jung Pak, top Korea expert at the Brookings Institutio­n.

The joint statement, however, contained only a vague commitment to “complete denucleari­zation of the Korean peninsula” — terminolog­y favored by Pyongyang and Beijing. In North Korea’s interpreta­tion, say experts, this means an end to the U.S. troop presence in South Korea and nuclear umbrella over that country and Japan — without any specifics on eliminatin­g its own nuclear program.

By using this language — and ending joint exercises — Trump acceded to Kim’s game plan. He went even further, repeating his desire to pull U.S. troops out of Korea (although not immediatel­y). All this before North Korea makes any firm commitment to giving up its nuclear weapons programs.

True, Kim has frozen his nuclear tests and missile tests — for now. And he has destroyed an already collapsing nuclear test site and promised Trump more on other sites. But none of this speaks to the onetime American demand that North Korean completely, irrevocabl­y and verifiably destroy its weapons.

Negotiatio­ns will now commence, but if the past is prologue, they could drag on and never reach a firm conclusion. Meanwhile, U.S. leverage on North Korea is declining, as China and Russia start to loosen sanctions. A push for a formal peace between North and South Korea will weaken any future pressure. And Trump’s eagerness to halt joint military exercises undermines U.S. leverage further.

This gives North Korea little reason to swiftly negotiate an end to its weapons program. After all, the U.S. president has told the world that Kim is “very smart” and “honorable” and “wants to do the right thing.” Trump even sloughed off questions at a news conference about North Korean forced labor camps where thousands are tortured and murdered, saying such things happen elsewhere.

Trump couldn’t resume insulting the great Korean leader. Much easier to insult a democratic prime minister like Justin Trudeau.

The irony here is that, contrary to Trump’s exaggerate­d claims, Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush got much more specific commitment­s from Pyongyang. In 1992, 1994, and 2005, the North Koreans pledged to eliminate all their nuclear weapons. They reneged.

When asked why he’d do better, Trump bragged: “This is a much different president.” Clearly this president believes his smarts will get results from North Korea, where previous presidents failed.

The good news is that war on the Korean peninsula looks far less likely than a few months ago. But judging from the Singapore summit, it is Kim Jong Un who has mastered the art of dealing with Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States