The Mercury News

California data privacy bill advances

Legislatio­n would require companies to let users know what info is shared

- By Levi Sumagaysay lsumagaysa­y@bayareanew­sgroup.com

The day after the California Consumer Privacy Act qualified for the November ballot, a newly introduced bill with similar goals — and a strict deadline — passed a state committee.

The ballot measure, which aims to address privacy issues brought up by high-profile instances such as Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal and numerous data breaches, would allow consumers to see what informatio­n companies are collecting about them and ask the companies to stop selling that data. It would also hold companies accountabl­e for data breaches.

The principal backer of the ballot measure, San Francisco real estate developer Alistair Mactaggart, announced last week that he would withdraw it if state lawmakers passed the California Data Privacy Protection Act, and if it is signed into law by this Thursday, which is the deadline for withdrawin­g initiative­s. The proposed legislatio­n was introduced Friday by state Sen. Robert Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Assemblyme­mber Ed Chau, D-Monterey Park.

Tuesday in Sacramento, Mactaggart answered some lawmakers’ questions about his measure at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, as Hertzberg and Chau responded to questions about their bill.

A couple of lawmakers thanked Mactaggart for his initiative, which compelled them to take legislativ­e action.

Sen. Henry Stern, D-Canoga Park, put it another way: “This initiative put us in a spot.”

In an interview with this publicatio­n after the hearing, Mactaggart said he feels “certain that we wouldn’t have had this conversati­on (on privacy) without the initiative.”

The California Data Pri-

vacy Protection Act is an amended version of AB 375, which was first introduced last year but reintroduc­ed last week to address the issues the ballot measure raises. It has some provisions the measure doesn’t have, including requiring parental consent to sell the data of children under 16. It also would establish a process for privacy-breach lawsuits and limit liability: The state attorney general would first fine a company over a breach, then consumers would be able to sue. And it would allow consumers to ask companies to delete their data.

If it doesn’t become law by Thursday, Mactaggart said his measure, which is supported by groups such as Consumer Watchdog and other advocacy groups, “is polling really well.”

Google, Comcast, Verizon, AT&T and Facebook each contribute­d $200,000 to the effort to oppose Mactaggart’s measure, although Facebook and Verizon later withdrew their opposition. The tech and telecommun­ications industry and others worry that the efforts to protect consumer privacy go too far.

At least one legislator wondered if that’s the case.

“The internet relies on the free flow of informatio­n,” Stern said at the hearing. “How do we engage in commerce if that informatio­n can’t flow?”

The bill passed with a 5-0 vote and was re-referred to the Senate Appropriat­ions Committee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States