The Mercury News

Ex-IT staffer reaches plea deal that debunks Trump theories

- By Shawn Boburg and Spencer S. Hsu

WASHINGTON >> Federal prosecutor­s concluded an 18-month investigat­ion into a former congressio­nal technology staffer on Tuesday by publicly debunking allegation­s — promoted by conservati­ve media and President Donald Trump — suggesting he was a Pakistani operative who stole government secrets with cover from House Democrats.

As part of an agreement with prosecutor­s, Imran Awan pleaded guilty to a relatively minor offense unrelated to his work on Capitol Hill: making a false statement on a bank loan applicatio­n. U.S. prosecutor­s said they would not recommend jail time.

But the agreement included an unusual passage that described the scope of the investigat­ion and cleared Awan of a litany of conspiracy theories promulgate­d on Internet blogs, picked up by rightleani­ng news sites, and fanned by Trump on Twitter.

“The Government has uncovered no evidence that your client violated federal law with respect to the House computer systems,” including stealing equipment or illegally accessing or transferri­ng informatio­n, including sensitive or classified informatio­n, prosecutor­s wrote in an 11-page plea agreement dated and signed Tuesday.

Federal prosecutor­s described in the agreement a “thorough investigat­ion” that included forensic analysis of computer equipment and other devices, logon and usage data and interviews with about 40 witnesses. Awan and four of his associates, including family members, worked as IT specialist­s

for dozens of Democratic lawmakers until they were banned from the computer network in February 2017 for allegedly violating House security rules. The ensuing investigat­ion attracted aggressive coverage by conservati­ve media outlets — led by the Daily Caller — and prompted calls from Trump to prosecute Awan, whom the president referred to in one tweet as the “Pakistani mystery man.”

The case has highlighte­d Trump’s willingnes­s to lobby for specific outcomes of federal criminal investigat­ions and to suggest a cover-up by his own Department of Justice. Trump also attempted to tie Awan to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee server — a breach that intelligen­ce agencies have concluded was directed by Russia.

“Our Justice Department must not let Awan & Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the hook,” he tweeted last month mentioning the Florida Democrat and onetime chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, after a court filing indicated prosecutor­s were in plea negotiatio­ns. “The Democrat I.T. scandal is a key to much of the corruption we see today.

They want to make a ‘plea deal’ to hide what is on their Server. Where is Server? Really bad!”

Prosecutor­s with the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the District of Columbia did not mention Trump or any media publicatio­ns by name in the agreement.

But the agreement included an exhaustive list of “public allegation­s” that prosecutor­s investigat­ed and shot down, including that investigat­ors took custody of the House Democratic server.

“Particular­ly, the Government has found no evidence that your client illegally removed House data from the House network or from House Members’ offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus Server, stole or destroyed House informatio­n technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferre­d government informatio­n, including classified or sensitive informatio­n.”

The office that conducted the investigat­ion is led by Trump-nominated U.S. Attorney Jessie K. Liu. Awan was released from electronic monitoring and will be free pending his sentencing Aug. 21, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan ordered after accepting Awan’s plea.

 ?? BONNIE JO MOUNT — THE WASHINGTON POST ?? The lawyer for Imran Awan, above, called the case a “political prosecutio­n” and a “tremendous waste of law enforcemen­t time and resources.”
BONNIE JO MOUNT — THE WASHINGTON POST The lawyer for Imran Awan, above, called the case a “political prosecutio­n” and a “tremendous waste of law enforcemen­t time and resources.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States