The Mercury News

Vote yes on Prop. 12, give farm animals a cage-free environmen­t

-

Shoppers buying eggs in California grocery stores can see firsthand the progress that has been made since 2008 when 64 percent of California voters passed an initiative designed to halt the practice of housing hens in cages so small that they were virtually immobile.

Eggs produced from cagefree or free-roaming hens are readily available. Major corporatio­ns such as McDonald’s, Safeway, Starbucks and Walmart have committed to only buying cage-free eggs, and others are following suit. But there is still work to be done to meet the goal of creating a more humane environmen­t for California’s 15.5 million egg-laying hens.

Voters should approve Propositio­n 12 on the November ballot. The initiative requires that egg-laying hens be cage-free by 2021 and housed in an environmen­t that allows them a minimum of 144 square inches, equal to a square foot, of space per hen. That standard also would apply to farmers in other states that sell eggs in California.

The propositio­n doesn’t stop at only protecting hens. It also requires that breeding pigs and calves used for veal be cage-free by 2020 and allowed to roam inside barns. California does not have sizable pork and veal industries, but the propositio­n would ban the sales from other states not meeting California’s standards.

The propositio­n isn’t perfect. Midwestern states will challenge California’s ability to impose standards on their farms. And we would greatly prefer that this sort of law be vetted and passed by the Legislatur­e rather than approved by ballot measure. Backers of Prop. 12 keep trying that avenue but run into immovable opposition from both the agricultur­e industry and opponents who would rather see farm animals and their products not be consumed by people, period.

Because California hens lay 5 billion eggs a year for human consumptio­n, the state has a moral obligation to encourage the most humane conditions possible.

Neither proponents nor opponents of the propositio­n could answer the question of what percentage of California’s egg-laying hens live in cagefree environmen­ts. But nationally, since the 2008 measure was passed, the number has increased from 3 percent in 2009 to nearly 13 percent in 2017. Hens’ natural behavior demands that they have scratch areas, perches and nests for laying that cage-free settings allow.

It’s true that hens allowed to roam sometimes attack and even kill other hens, something that cannot happen when they are caged. But as we argued in 2008, while Mother Nature may be cruel, it doesn’t mean humans have to be, too.

The situation is even worse for pigs and calves. The majority of the pork and veal California­ns eat comes from farms that confine pigs and calves in gestation crates so small that they do not have the space to move or turn around. The ballot measure allows farmers wanting to sell pork and veal in California sufficient time to convert their operations without doing undue harm to their business.

Some farmers argue that the end result will be increased prices for consumers. But McDonald’s said it wouldn’t be raising prices at all as a result of going with cage-free hens. And even if it did, it’s a small price to pay for substantia­lly improving the lives of millions of hens, pigs and calves. Vote yes on Propositio­n 12.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Propositio­n 12 requires that egg-laying hens be cage-free by 2020 and allowed to roam inside barns.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Propositio­n 12 requires that egg-laying hens be cage-free by 2020 and allowed to roam inside barns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States