The Mercury News

House passes bill that defines ‘crime of violence’

- By Mike DeBonis The Washington Post

WASHINGTON >> The House on Friday passed a bill that would restore the federal government’s ability to deport immigrants for a wide variety of violent criminal offenses in a vote that won quick praise from President Donald Trump.

The Community Safety and Security Act aims to address an April Supreme Court ruling that found that the federal definition of a “crime of violence,” which under immigratio­n law prompts the mandatory deportatio­n of a noncitizen, is impermissi­bly vague. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Karen Handel, R-Ga., specifical­ly enumerates more than a dozen crimes that would qualify.

The bill passed 247-152, largely along party lines.

Democrats objected to the bill for being rushed to the floor without hearings or an amendment process in committee, though 29 broke ranks and supported it; four libertaria­n-oriented Republican­s opposed it.

Trump tweeted his approval of the legislatio­n early Friday afternoon: “House GOP just passed a bill to increase our ability to deport violent felons (Crazy Dems opposed). Need to get this bill to my desk fast!”

Among the offenses that would be considered a “crime of violence” under the bill: “murder, voluntary manslaught­er, assault, sexual abuse or aggravated sexual abuse, abusive sexual contact, child abuse, kidnapping, robbery, carjacking, firearms use, burglary, arson, extortion, communicat­ion of threats, coercion, fleeing, interferen­ce with flight crew members and attendants, domestic violence, hostage taking, stalking, human traffickin­g, piracy or a terrorism offense” defined elsewhere in federal law.

Also qualifying would be any offense involving illegal explosives or weapons of mass destructio­n.

The American Civil Liberties Union and several immigrant rights groups opposed the bill, and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, warned its hasty considerat­ion could create unforeseen consequenc­es.

“The Judiciary Committee has had ample time to examine the decision, to hold hearings, to gather input from a range of stakeholde­rs and to carefully develop legislatio­n through a markup and regular order,” he said Friday on the House floor. “But none of those things have happened.

The bill’s prospects in the Senate are uncertain.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has not taken up any legislatio­n to address the “crime of violence” definition, and Senate leaders have not announced any plans to bring a stand-alone bill, like the House measure, to the floor before the current Congress ends in December.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States