The Mercury News

Trump strikes a blow for global democracy in stand against ICC

- By Marc A. Thiessen The Washington Post Marc Thiessen is a Washington Post columnist.

WASHINGTON >> Should an unaccounta­ble United Nations court, created by a treaty to which the United States is not a signatory, and that the Senate has not ratified, be allowed to investigat­e, try and imprison American citizens?

Unfortunat­ely, this is no longer a theoretica­l question. In November, the chief prosecutor of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court at The Hague, Fatou Bensouda, announced she was seeking a formal investigat­ion into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. military forces and CIA officers in Afghanista­n.

Bensouda — a Gambian lawyer who’s answerable to no government or institutio­n — claims unbridled power to investigat­e, charge and prosecute American citizens, no matter what the U.S. government says. A pretrial chamber of the court, made up of judges from Hungary, France and Benin, reportedly will approve her request in the coming days.

Who gave these foreign magistrate­s the right to try U.S. citizens, whose government never assented to the court’s jurisdicti­on through our own democratic institutio­ns? No one. And, yet, they are preparing to exercise this supranatio­nal power for the first time.

That won’t happen if the Trump administra­tion has anything to say about it. In a speech last week to the Federalist Society, national security adviser John Bolton delivered a stark warning to the ICC: “If the court comes after us … this administra­tion will fight back to protect American constituti­onalism, our sovereignt­y, and our citizens. No committee of foreign nations will tell us how to govern ourselves and defend our freedom.”

Should the court act against U.S. citizens, Bolton said, the United States will bar ICC judges and prosecutor­s from entering the country, sanction their funds in the U.S. financial system and prosecute them in the American criminalju­stice system.

I was present at the ICC’s creation. In 1998, as a staff member for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I attended the Rome conference where the treaty was negotiated. The committee’s chairman, Sen. Jesse Helms, RN.C., warned that unless checks were placed on the ICC prosecutor’s unfettered discretion to prosecute U.S. citizens — including a U.N. Security Council “screen” that would permit the United States to veto cases going forward — the Rome treaty would be “dead on arrival” in the Senate.

When those protection­s were rejected, Helms introduced the “American Servicemem­bers’ Protection Act” to bar U.S. cooperatio­n with the ICC and to punish the court for any efforts to prosecute Americans. The measure was approved in 2002 by a bipartisan 75-to-19 vote. So not only has the Senate not ratified the ICC treaty, it has explicitly authorized the president to use “all means necessary” — including military force — to shield American citizens from ICC prosecutio­n.

We were told then this was unnecessar­y, and that the court would focus on grievous human-rights abuses by the world’s tyrants, not on democracie­s with robust and transparen­t legal systems capable of policing their own citizens. That was a lie.

Not only is the ICC threatenin­g Americans, it has our democratic ally, Israel, in its crosshairs. In 2015, Bensouda opened a preliminar­y investigat­ion of Israel for actions defending itself against Palestinia­n terrorist attacks in the West Bank and Gaza — despite the fact that the court has no jurisdicti­on because Israel isn’t a party to the treaty, and because Palestinia­n territorie­s cannot be a “state party” to the treaty considerin­g they aren’t a “state.”

The ICC is also a hindrance to democratic change. Since the end of the Cold War, almost every peaceful transition from dictatorsh­ip to democracy has involved some form of amnesty. With the ICC, the option of safety for dictators in exile has effectivel­y been eliminated. The lesson to tyrants such as Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega or Iran’s ayatollahs is clear: If the people rise up, it’s safer to fire on the crowds than to flee.

By taking on the ICC, the Trump administra­tion isn’t just protecting U.S. citizens and American sovereignt­y — it’s striking a blow for democracy across the world.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States