The Mercury News

House Dems eye revival of Russia probe

- By Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON >> House Democrats are expected to reopen the investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election if they win the majority in November. But they would have to be selective in what they investigat­e.

California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligen­ce panel, has said his party would have to “ruthlessly prioritize the most important matters first.”

The Republican-led Intelligen­ce Committee was the only House panel to investigat­e Russian meddling, and its investigat­ion is now closed. Republican­s said they found no evidence of collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump’s campaign.

Democrats say Republican­s ignored key facts and important witnesses and want to restart parts of the investigat­ion if they win the House. But some Democrats worry there could be a political cost if they overreach.

Schiff and other lawmakers say they are closely watching special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigat­ion and the Senate’s Russia probe to look for gaps that they could fill. And if Mueller issues any findings, their investigat­ive plans could change.

“My sense is that we want to be precise,” said California Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democratic member of the intelligen­ce panel.

Here’s a look at what Democrats are likely to investigat­e if they take the House majority.

Money laundering

Schiff has repeatedly said a priority for Democrats would be investigat­ing whether Russians used laundered money for transactio­ns with the Trump Organizati­on.

Trump’s businesses have benefited from Russian investment over the years. Schiff said he wants to know whether “this is the leverage that the Russians have” over Trump.

Other committees might also want to look into money laundering, including the House Financial Services panel.

More witnesses

The Democrats issued a list in March of several dozen people the committee hadn’t yet interviewe­d when the Russia investigat­ion was shut down. Democrats would want to call in some — but probably not all — of those witnesses. Former Trump campaign advisers Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, and George Papadopoul­os are among them. They all pleaded guilty to various charges in the Mueller probe and have cooperated with prosecutor­s.

Important witnesses whose credibilit­y Democrats have questioned might be called back. That includes Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty in federal court in August to campaign-finance violations and other charges, and prominent Trump supporter Erik Prince, who met with Russians during the campaign. Prince was defiant in an interview with the intelligen­ce panel in December.

“I believe there are those who were less than candid with us,” said Illinois Rep. Mike Quigley, a Democratic member of the committee, referring to Cohen and Prince, among others.

Democrats have said they also want additional documents that Republican­s refused to subpoena.

Public hearings

House Republican­s limited their Russia investigat­ion to the intelligen­ce panel, which traditiona­lly conducts most of its business in secret. Democrats would probably spread the investigat­ion over several other committees, opening it up and allowing for public hearings with top Trump officials.

Texas Rep. Joaquin Castro, a Democratic member of the intelligen­ce panel, said they would try to be more transparen­t. The Republican probe was “a way to keep everything behind closed doors,” he said.

Democrats also would push to provide interview transcript­s to Mueller, a step Republican­s had resisted. The committee recently voted to make most of its Russia transcript­s public, but it’s unclear when that will happen.

Donald Trump Jr.

Democrats have pushed for more informatio­n about Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and communicat­ions with his father and other aides related to a June 2016 meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer.

According to phone records he provided to Congress, Trump Jr. had a call with a blocked number several days before the meeting took place; he said he didn’t recall with whom. Democrats want to subpoena additional phone records because Trump Jr. has insisted he didn’t alert his father to the meeting beforehand. They also want informatio­n about his communicat­ions with former Trump communicat­ions aide Hope Hicks.

Trump’s taxes

Democrats in the majority would probably push for the release of Trump’s tax returns, a task that would be up to the House Ways and Means Committee. Trump broke a decadeslon­g tradition by declining to release his returns during the campaign. The Republican House and Senate have declined to ask for them.

Lawmakers hope access to Trump’s taxes would reveal informatio­n about his financial entangleme­nts with other countries. But getting them may not be easy. The tax-writing committees in Congress can obtain tax records from the IRS under the law, but it is possible the Trump administra­tion would refuse to hand them over, prompting a court fight.

Issues tied to collusion

Since Republican­s closed the Russia investigat­ion this year, Democrats on the intelligen­ce panel have conducted some of their own investigat­ions despite not having subpoena power.

They have made progress in probing Cambridge Analytica, a data analytics firm once employed by the Trump campaign that improperly gained access to data from millions of social media profiles. They also have investigat­ed Republican operative Peter W. Smith, who worked to obtain Democrat Hillary Clinton’s emails from Russian hackers, according to the Wall Street Journal. Smith died shortly after talking to the paper.

Protection for Mueller

A Democratic House probably would try to move legislatio­n to protect Mueller. Trump has repeatedly criticized Mueller and his investigat­ion, calling it a witch hunt. Prompted by concerns that Trump may try to fire Mueller, the GOPled Senate Judiciary Committee approved legislatio­n in April that would give any special counsel a 10-day window to seek expedited judicial review of a firing. The bill would put into law existing Justice Department regulation­s that a special counsel can only be fired for good cause.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States