The Mercury News

U.S. must stop arguing and close the broadband gap

- By David Witkowski David Witkowski is the executive director of civic technology initiative­s for Joint Venture Silicon Valley.

Broadband, sometimes called the “Fifth Utility,” has become a critical part of 21st-century life — equal in importance to electricit­y, natural gas, water and sanitation. As more common daily life activities like paying bills or applying for jobs move to the internet, and wired phone service is abandoned in favor of cellular, people lacking access to wireless telecommun­ications are increasing­ly at a great disadvanta­ge. Lack of robust access to wireless data service creates a socioecono­mic problem referred to as the broadband gap.

Wireless data and voice communicat­ions are critical tools for our daily lives, and we expect our access to it to be fast, robust, and available everywhere all the time. When you can’t get a cellular signal and there’s no Wi-Fi, you feel cut off and trapped.

Data usage, especially on mobile devices like smartphone­s, is exponentia­lly increasing and is exceeding the existing system’s ability to support it. We must update and expand the infrastruc­ture that provides these broadband services.

Unfortunat­ely, we lack a unified national vision for how to make this happen. Debates are

raging at the local, state and federal level about how to classify broadband internet under Federal Communicat­ions Commission rules, how much flexibilit­y broadband providers have to tune their service offerings, and how to balance the need to build telecommun­ications infrastruc­ture against the need for local government­s to manage and control public property.

In late September, the FCC issued an order and declarator­y ruling for wireless facilities — enhancing a 1996 law that constraine­d a local government’s ability to prohibit deployment of wireless facilities. Without the 1996 law, we would not have the wireless networks we have today.

Some have argued that the FCC’s recent order and ruling goes too far, stripping local government­s of their ability to negotiate good deals with the wireless industry for use of public property. Others argue that the order and ruling is necessary and justified based on cases where local government­s have either openly banned wireless facilities or effectivel­y banned them by demanding exorbitant prices, dragging out review and permitting processes for years, or implementi­ng other procedural barriers.

Both sides agree that the pace of wireless network constructi­on and expansion has not kept up with demand. Even today in Silicon Valley, which was a major developer of radio and wireless technology long before the first silicon transistor was invented, it’s not hard to find places where the only available wireless service is older, 3G technology.

We can and must do better. At Joint Venture Silicon Valley’s Wireless Communicat­ions Initiative, we’ve been working to resolve these conflicts by convening stakeholde­rs from both the wireless industry and local government­s to reach consensus and a shared vision for the region’s wireless future. We believe that dialogue between stakeholde­rs at the regional level is the best approach to balancing needs and wants from both the wireless industry and local government­s.

The impact of our work could be significan­t. The wireless industry is poised to invest nearly $275 billion over the next five years in deployment of nextgenera­tion wireless technology in the United States alone. That’s a level of investment exceeded only by the federal government’s investment in the interstate highway system during the Cold War. $275 billion will be the largest private investment in national infrastruc­ture ever made.

Despite this potential for massive private investment in our regional, state and national infrastruc­ture, divergence in vision for our country’s broadband future is growing. The importance of wireless broadband must rise above pedantic partisan bickering.

Our citizens can and should contact their representa­tives and insist that they set aside partisan bickering and focus on defining a long-term vision for our country’s telecommun­ications future. You can learn more and get involved by subscribin­g to our mailing list at www.jointventu­re.org/wireless.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? The Federal Communicat­ions Commission, under the leadership of Ajit Pai, in late September issued an order and declarator­y ruling for wireless facilities – enhancing a 1996law that constraine­d a local government’s ability to prohibit deployment of wireless facilities.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Federal Communicat­ions Commission, under the leadership of Ajit Pai, in late September issued an order and declarator­y ruling for wireless facilities – enhancing a 1996law that constraine­d a local government’s ability to prohibit deployment of wireless facilities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States