The Mercury News

Motorists need to understand capabiliti­es, role of autopilot

- Gary Richards Gary Richards has an hourlong chat noon Wednesday at www. mercurynew­s.com/livechats. Contact him at 408-920-5037.

Q

All these articles about cars with autopilot and the drivers who overly rely on the system remind me of a similar issue the aviation industry had in the 1970s-1980s with airplane pilots and aircraft autopilot systems. Does this sound familiar? Pilots didn’t fully understand the capabiliti­es and limitation­s of the system.

They became overly reliant on the system and lost proficienc­y at manually flying the airplane in critical situations. Pilots would be oblivious to errors the autopilot was making or placed too much faith that the autopilot was doing the right things at the right time.

Now we’re making the same mistakes when it comes to automobile autopilots. The bottom line is we are moving too fast toward autonomous cars, and it doesn’t appear we’ve learned from, or are applying the lessons from, pilots and airplanes.

— Tom Gray

Livermore

A

This is in response to an AAA survey that found that 40 percent of drivers believe cars with auto-assist tools can be driven autonomous­ly. That is not true and is a dangerous belief.

Q

The problem with Tesla autopilot is not that 40 percent of drivers misunderst­and its capability, the problem is that 100 percent of people know what the word “autopilot” has always meant: “a device for keeping an aircraft on a set course without the interventi­on of a pilot.” While it is incumbent on a driver to know the features and capabiliti­es of the car being driven, it seems highly negligent to label a driver-assist feature “autopilot” when it is not capable of being used in the sense that that word has always meant. Phil Grover Concord A

But semantics aside, here is another view. Q

I read the comments regarding Tesla autopilot with some dismay. I have a Model 3, and I think the features work very well. People who have never used them may not realize how truly amazing they are.

I was apprehensi­ve the first couple of times I used them, but now I would never drive manually in heavy traffic. The capabiliti­es are being improved almost monthly with frequent software updates being delivered automatica­lly.

The AAA needs to repeat their tests as none of the issues they raised are occurring with the current system.

My car works great on Highway 17, is much more relaxing to drive in heavy traffic, no lane departures or wandering, no late braking, etc. The car can safely maneuver lane changes (no need to worry about blind spots).

Full auto mode is still not available, so drivers absolutely need to maintain awareness. By the end of next year, Mercedes, Cadillac and several other manufactur­ers will have matching capabiliti­es.

Let’s not jump the gun and assume because of a couple of idiot drivers that this is a bad idea. Steve Brock San Jose A

Steve, you have convinced me.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States