The Mercury News

Thank you, Justice Roberts, for drawing a red line with Trump

- By Thomas L. Friedman Thomas L. Friedman is a New York Times columnist.

For me, the most disturbing thing about the Trump presidency is the way each week, like a steady drip of acid, Donald Trump tries to erode the thing that truly makes us great as a country and the envy of so many around the world — the independen­ce and nonpartisa­n character of our courts, our military, our FBI, our Border Patrol and our whole federal bureaucrac­y.

No modern president has been more willing to use U.S. service members or border police as props for his politics, to blithely declare without evidence that most of the 800,000 federal workers going unpaid during the government shutdown are Democrats, to refer to the Pentagon leadership as “my generals” and “my military,” and to denounce different federal judges who have ruled against him as a “so-called judge,” an “Obama judge” and a “Mexican” judge (even though he was born in Indiana).

Why is this so important? Because America’s core governing institutio­ns weren’t built to be “conservati­ve” or “liberal.” They were built to take our deepest values and our highest ideals and animate them, promote them and protect them. They are the continuity that binds one generation of Americans to the next and the beacon for how we work together to build an ever more perfect union.

The independen­t, nonpartisa­n quality of our institutio­ns is why so many people want to immigrate to America. So when an American leader denigrates those institutio­ns, tries to erode their independen­ce or turns them into political props, he damages the very core of what makes our country unique.

And that’s why today I would like to give a shoutout to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts for having the integrity and courage to call Trump out for this behavior, to draw a red line around the judicial branch and to signal to Trump — politely but firmly — to keep his hands off its independen­ce and nonpartisa­n charter.

Roberts did so in November, after a federal judge in San Francisco put Trump’s asylum policy on hold and the president denounced him as an “Obama judge.”

Responding to a query from The Associated Press, Roberts said: “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordin­ary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”

That brushback pitch by Roberts — a high fastball right under Trump’s chin — was highly unusual but important. Of course, our judges are appointed by politician­s with the hope that they’ll reflect their own or their party’s ideologica­l bent on issues that come before them — and they often do.

But Roberts knows that central to our system is that every American is able to expect an impartial hearing before those judges, who, once they assume their place on the bench, should be loyal only to the Constituti­on and their interpreta­tions of it.

I’ve spent four decades reporting from countries with weak institutio­ns where the arbitrary whims of the leader or his party are the basis of all decision-making.

But Trump appreciate­s none of this. I don’t think he ever understood the separation of powers or the meaning of independen­t agencies. That’s why the shutdown doesn’t bother him.

This is not a test. This is a real, live emergency for our democracy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States