The Mercury News

Trump threatens Guatemala after its court blocks asylum deal

- By Jill Colvin, Sonia Perez D. and Paul Wiseman

WASHINGTON » President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened retributio­n against Guatemala over immigratio­n after the country’s high court blocked its government from signing an asylum deal with the United States.

Trump tweeted that Guatemala has decided against signing a “safe-third agreement” requiring Central American migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. to instead apply for those protection­s in Guatemala, even though the country’s government never said it had agreed to the arrangemen­t.

Guatemala “has decided to break the deal they had with us on signing a necessary Safe Third Agreement. We were ready to go,” Trump complained. “Now we are looking at the ‘BAN,’” he wrote, along with tariffs, fees on remittance money Guatemalan­s working in the U.S. send back to their country, “or all of the above.”

Trump later painted the court ruling as a convenient excuse for the country, saying: “In other words, they didn’t want to sign it.”

Trump has been trying to get countries including Guatemala to do more to stop the flood of Central American migrants who have been overwhelmi­ng the U.S. southern border, jeopardizi­ng his campaign promise to end illegal immigratio­n. Negotiatio­ns over a potential deal ended when Guatemala’s Constituti­onal Court granted three injunction­s preventing President Jimmy Morales from entering into a deal.

A July 15 meeting between Trump and Guatemala’s president was also called off because the high court had yet to issue its ruling.

Morales responded to the tweets with a statement posted on Facebook blaming Guatemala’s Constituti­onal Court justices for upsetting Trump.

“The repercussi­ons of the Government of the United States of America toward Guatemala derive from a series of counterpro­ductive actions by the Constituti­onal Court, which on repeated occasions has ruled against the content and spirit of our Constituti­on,” Morales said, adding that “most of its judges, identified as having personal political interests, have used their investment to meddle in the foreign policy of the Guatemalan state.”

Trump nonetheles­s accused the country’s leaders of having gone “back on their word to us” in remarks at a summit of conservati­ve teenagers in Washington.

“They were all set to sign a safe third agreement and then today or yesterday, they announced they can’t do it because they got a Supreme Court ruling. Their Supreme Court, right?” Trump said in a dismissive tone, repeating his tariff and “ban” threat.

The White House did not respond to questions Tuesday about what he meant in his reference to a “ban,” but the United States is Guatemala’s most important trade partner, with the countries swapping $10.9 billion worth of goods last year. The top U.S. exports to Guatemala include fuel minerals such as coal, petroleum and natural gas; machinery and corn. Top imports from Guatemala include bananas and plantains, clothing and coffee.

Still, Guatemala’s economy is small and its people poor, making for a lopsided relationsh­ip. Guatemala ranks just 46th among U.S. partners in the trade of goods, and any sanctions would likely first impact Guatemala’s financial and industrial elite, said political analyst Roberto Santiago.

Trump could also hurt the country by trying to tax remittance­s, which are equal to 12.1% of the Guatemalan economy, according to the World Bank.

Trump also accused the country by tweet of “forming Caravans and sending large numbers of people, some with criminal records, to the United States,” even though there is no evidence that the Guatemalan government had anything to do with organizing the migrant caravans or “sending” anyone to the U.S. The caravans, a phenomenon that died out months ago after Mexico cracked down, originated in neighborin­g Honduras and were joined by people from Guatemala, El Salvador and elsewhere as they moved through Guatemala and then Mexico.

Trump’s comments came a day after the two countries issued a friendly joint statement that made no mention of the “safethird” idea. Instead, it said the two government­s “continue to make important progress on a comprehens­ive regional approach to addressing irregular migration patterns,” citing joint efforts “to reduce the flow of irregular migration and ensure the safety and protection of vulnerable population­s, especially children.”

U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials were set to meet with officials from the Northern Triangle countries Wednesday.

A “safe-third agreement” would mean that Salvadoran­s, Hondurans and people from elsewhere who cross into Guatemala would have to apply for asylum there instead of doing so at the U.S. border — potentiall­y easing the crush of migrants overwhelmi­ng the U.S. immigratio­n system and handing Trump a concession he could herald as a win.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States