The Mercury News

State threatens lawsuit against Cupertino over unbuilt housing

Officials say massive, stalled project on Vallco site must go forward

- By Marisa Kendall and Thy Vo Staff writers

Cupertino, often criticized by activists over a perceived reluctance to build homes, is now officially on notice — the city must shape up its housing efforts or face the consequenc­es, according to a warning letter from the state.

In the letter, the California Department of Housing and Community Developmen­t threatened a lawsuit if Cupertino does not meet its housing obligation­s under state law. At issue is a massive housing, office and retail developmen­t proposed on the site of the old Vallco Shopping Mall, which has faced obstacle after obstacle as developers try to get the project off the ground. If the homes promised under that project aren’t built, the state warned, Cupertino could fall out of compliance with its state-mandated housing goals.

While no legal action has been taken against the city, the letter illustrate­s how the state is ramping up its enforcemen­t of California housing law under Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has made solving the housing crisis a priority. State housing officials sent a similar letter to San Bruno officials last week. In January, the state sued Huntington Beach for failing to allow enough homebuildi­ng.

“HCD appreciate­s the difficulty jurisdicti­ons face in balancing competing interests when making land use decisions,” housing department Deputy Directory Zachary Olmstead wrote in the letter to Cupertino’s city manager Friday. “However, the City also has

the responsibi­lity to zone adequate sites to accommodat­e housing needs and to ensure that new housing developmen­t opportunit­ies are available to meet the housing needs of all members of the community.”

Cupertino Mayor Steven Sharf said he had read the letter but would not comment on how the city will respond until after he discussed it with the city attorney. But he said Cupertino has granted entitlemen­ts for several projects that are bringing the city into compliance with its state housing goals. The problem is not that the city is blocking housing — it’s that developers aren’t building the housing, he said.

“The cities don’t actually build the housing,” he said. “We entitle it and we approve plans and issue permits. If these property owners don’t submit plans and ask for permits, there’s very little we could do.”

Cupertino was responsibl­e for zoning and planning for the constructi­on of 1,064 new housing units by 2023, according to the letter. To meet that goal, city officials were supposed to adopt a specific plan and rezoning to build housing on the Vallco Mall site. But in May, city officials rescinded that plan after

pushback from some residents. Now developer Sand Hill Property Co. is moving forward with another plan — to build 2,402 homes, 1.8 million square feet of office space and 400,000 square feet of retail on the site. That proposal was greenlight­ed under a new housing law — Senate Bill 35 — that requires cities to fasttrack certain residentia­l and mixed-use projects.

But a group of residents who oppose the project, Friends of Better Cupertino, is suing the city to block the project and rescind its SB 35 approval. The city is not fighting the lawsuit, the state noted in its letter.

A hearing in that case is scheduled for Sept. 6.

If the developer loses that lawsuit and the project comes to a halt, Cupertino could land in violation of state housing law, according to the letter. And Cupertino officials now are considerin­g amending the city’s general plan to remove all office space allocation­s at the Vallco site. The general plan amendment wouldn’t affect the SB 35 project, but it would affect any project proposed for that site otherwise, and could make it economical­ly challengin­g to build housing there as well.

Councilman Rod Sinks expressed his disappoint­ment with Cupertino’s recent housing policies.

“We are being used as a poster child for why the state should take away local control, which I think is very, very unfortunat­e,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States