The Mercury News

Mysterious missile explosion in Russia raises questions

- By Vladimir Isachenkov

MOSCOW » A deadly explosion at a naval weapons testing range in northweste­rn Russia. A brief spike in radiation levels. An evacuation order issued, then rescinded, for a nearby village.

Last week’s mysterious accident on the White Sea, along with changing or contradict­ory informatio­n from Russian authoritie­s, has led to speculatio­n about what happened and what type of weapon was involved, and has even raised comparison­s to the 1986 disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.

What is known and unknown about the Aug. 8 incident in the Russian region of Arkhangels­k:

The secret testing range

A testing range was set up near the village of Nyonoksa, about 615 miles north of Moscow on the White Sea in 1954, when the Soviet Union’s missile program was still in its nascent phase. It has served as the main ground for testing a variety of missiles used by the Soviet and then Russian navy ever since.

They included anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles of various types, as well as interconti­nental ballistic missiles intended for the nation’s nuclear submarines.

The authoritie­s have routinely closed various parts of the White Sea’s Dvina Bay to navigation during missile tests, and the approximat­ely 500 residents of Nyonoksa have regularly been asked to temporaril­y leave their homes, usually for a few hours at a time, apparently as a routine precaution during military activity.

The area has been off-limits to the outsiders, but tourists who ask for advance permission have been allowed to visit Nyonoksa, the site of a beautiful 18th century wooden church.

The village is connected by rail to Severodvin­sk, a city of 183,000 people about 19 miles to the east.

The explosion

First word of the explosion came from the Russian Defense Ministry, which initially said the Aug. 8 blast of a liquid-propellant rocket engine killed two people and injured six others. It said in a statement that no radiation had been released, although the city administra­tion in Severodvin­sk reported a brief rise in radiation levels — a contradict­ion that recalled Soviet-era cover-ups of disasters like Chernobyl.

Two days later, Russia’s state-controlled nuclear agency Rosatom acknowledg­ed that the explosion occurred on an offshore platform during tests of a “nuclear isotope power source,” and that it killed five nuclear engineers and injured three others. It’s still not clear whether those casualties were in addition to the earlier dead and injured.

The radiation

The city administra­tion in Severodvin­sk, which has a huge shipyard that builds nuclear submarines, said the radiation levels there rose to 2 microsieve­rts per hour — approximat­ely 20 times the area’s average reading — for about 30 minutes on Aug. 8. It then returned to the area’s average natural level of 0.1 microsieve­rts per hour.

Emergency officials issued a warning to all workers to stay indoors and close the windows. Frightened residents rushed to buy iodine, which can help reduce risks from exposure to radiation.

A later report from Russia’s state weather and environmen­tal monitoring agency said the peak radiation reading in Severodvin­sk on Aug. 8 was 1.78 microsieve­rts per hour in just one neighborho­od — about 16 times the average. Peak readings in other parts of Severodvin­sk varied between 0.45 and 1.33 microsieve­rts per hour. It said that radiation levels fell back to normal after 2½ hours.

The brief increase in radiation didn’t pose any health dangers, authoritie­s said. The recorded peak levels were indeed lower than the cosmic radiation that plane passengers are exposed to on longer flights or doses that patients get during some medical scans.

The authoritie­s haven’t registered any increase in radiation since then. Local emergency officials also said ground samples from around the area revealed no trace of radioactiv­e contaminat­ion.

The mystery missile

Neither the Defense Ministry nor Rosatom identified the type of weapon that exploded during the test.

But Rosatom’s statement said the explosion occurred during tests of a “nuclear isotope power source,” which led observers to conclude it was the “Burevestni­k” or “Storm Petrel,” a nuclear-powered cruise missile. NATO has code-named the missile “Skyfall.”

The missile was first revealed by Russian President Vladimir Putin in his 2018 state-of-the-nation address, along with other doomsday weapons.

President Donald Trump backed that theory Monday, tweeting, “The Russian ‘Skyfall’ explosion has people worried about the air around the facility, and far beyond. Not good!” Trump added that “the United States is learning much from the failed missile explosion in Russia. We have similar, though more advanced, technology.”

Both the U.S. and the Soviet Union worked on nuclear-powered missiles in the 1960s, but they abandoned such designs as too unstable and dangerous to operate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States