The Mercury News

Hangar One redux: A Google restoratio­n plan

$157 million facelift for landmark to include extensive toxic cleanup

- By George Avalos and Maggie Angst Staff writers

MOUNTAIN VIEW >> More than four years after taking over the colossal, stripped-to-itscore Hangar One at Moffett Federal Airfield, Google finally has sketched out a plan for removing the Peninsula landmark’s last toxic remnants so it can be restored and used once again.

When the facelift is complete, the 200-foot-high hangar— an iconic reminder of a bygone era of giant dirigibles that’s plainly visible to thousands of daily commuters on Highway 101 through Mountain View — could be used for a variety of techrelate­d purposes, although Google has not yet revealed any grand plan.

The proposed cleanup by Google’s subsidiary, Planetary Ventures, is “an important next step in the decade-long effort at the federal level to preserve and rehabilita­te this historic landmark at Moffett Field,” Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, said

in a statement.

“From being listed as one of America’s most endangered historic sites in 2008, Hangar One is finally moving toward a sustainabl­e restoratio­n that will protect the structure and ensure the health and safety of Moffett Field and the Bay,” Eshoo said.

Former Mountain View Mayor Lenny Siegel, who convened a committee more than a decade ago to save Hangar One from being razed by the Navy, said the cleanup and restoratio­n proposal is “what the Navy should have done in the first place.”

“I believe that our community should not only support the plan,” Siegel said in a statement. “I think we should thank (Planetary Ventures) for its commitment to restoring this huge, historic structure.”

Planetary Ventures has proposed a wide-ranging cleanup of the old structure’s remaining toxic materials such as paint laced with PCBs, asbestos and lead.

The potential cost could reach $156.8 million, according to a 300-page report prepared for Planetary Ventures by Burlingame-based EKI Environmen­t & Water, a consultant that prepared the remediatio­n and restoratio­n proposal for Hangar One, located at NASA Research Park.

“Future use of the hangar is not known at this time, but could include research and developmen­t activities, testing, light assembly and fabricatio­n, office space, and public access for events,” EKI stated in its report.

The 8-acre floor of Hangar One — large enough to accommodat­e six football fields — is so vast that it’s entirely possible a small office building or other structures could sprout inside.

“Additional facilities may be constructe­d inside the

hangar to support the primary research and developmen­t activities,” according to the EKI report, which was posted on a NASA site.

The 300-page report released last week outlines three options for getting rid of the toxic materials. The first option presented was to do nothing — included merely as a baseline for comparison. The second alternativ­e — estimated to cost $115 million — called for coating the structure with a new protective layer of paint and routine operating and maintenanc­e to ensure the coating holds up.

But EKI recommende­d the third, most expensive option.

Under this plan, contractor­s would use a technique called media blasting to remove materials from the steel frame, concrete masonry walls and concrete floors. The contractor­s also would use chemical stripping, as well as scraping with hand tools. That would then be followed up with

vacuuming and wiping of some surfaces.

“Media blasting is a process in which an abrasive media is introduced into compressed air,” the report states. “The compressed air or abrasive media mixture is then directed through a nozzle at high-velocity towards a desired surface coated with paint or other coatings.”

The $156.8 million price tag includes $85.8 million in constructi­on and capital costs, $54 million for scaffoldin­g around the mammoth structure, and $17 million for seismic upgrades, according to the EKI report.

The U.S. Navy completed Hangar One in 1933 to serve as home to the dirigible USS Macon.

By 1950, Moffett Field had become the largest naval air transport base on the West Coast.

In the 1980s the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency placed the site on the National Priority List for sites of known releases of

hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminan­ts. It was closed as an active military base in 1991 and transferre­d to NASA.

Following the discovery in 2003 that toxins were leaching from panels covering the hangar, the future of the Depression-era structure remained in limbo for nearly a decade before any action was taken.

Although NASA took over the site in 1994, the federal government deemed the Navy responsibl­e for cleaning it up. In 2011, the Navy spent four months removing the structure’s outside panels, leaving NASA Ames responsibl­e for reskinning the structure.

When NASA first considered the option of razing the structure entirely, preservati­onists came out in full force against the plan. NASA eventually relented and agreed to retain the structure, but a lack of funding left the steel frame exposed to the elements with no plans for restoratio­n.

In March 2013, the federal government began seeking private bids for the restoratio­n and reuse of the historic hangar, giving supporters a reason to cheer.

Then in March 2015, Google entered a $1.6 billion, 60-year lease with NASA to formally take over the 1,000-acre site with plans to repurpose its three airship hangars as laboratori­es for developing robots, rovers, drones, internet-carrying balloons and other cutting-edge technology, the company stated at the time.

NASA is holding a public meeting to offer additional informatio­n about the proposal and gather feedback at 6 p.m. Aug. 27 at the NASA Ames Conference Center at 500 Severyns Road. The public also is invited to review and send comments on the report to Garrett Michael Turner, NASA Ames Research Center restoratio­n program manager, at garrett.michael.turner@nasa.gov until Sept. 13.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States