The Mercury News

Ex-Trump top aide talks to investigat­ors

Source: Russia, Europe adviser, others aghast at ambassador’s removal

- By Peter Baker

WASHINGTON >> Fiona Hill, President Donald Trump’s former top Russia and Europe adviser, met with House impeachmen­t investigat­ors Monday prepared to testify that she and other officials objected strenuousl­y to the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine, only to be disregarde­d.

Hill, who stepped down from the White House’s National Security Council staff over the summer, viewed the recall of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitc­h from Kyiv as an egregious abuse of the system by allies of Trump who were seeking to push aside a perceived obstacle, according to a person familiar with Hill’s account. Yovanovitc­h told the investigat­ors in closeddoor testimony last week that the president had personally pushed for her ouster for months, based on “false claims.”

The removal of Yovanovitc­h has emerged as a key episode in the narrative under examinatio­n by the House as part of its impeachmen­t inquiry against Trump. A career diplomat,

Yovanovitc­h was targeted by Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, and other allies who were seeking to press Ukraine to investigat­e Trump’s Democratic rivals.

Hill’s interview kicked off what promises to be another active week of investigat­ion by the House, where Democrats opened a formal impeachmen­t inquiry late last month based on an intelligen­ce officer’s whistleblo­wer complaint that alleged that Trump had abused his power to try to enlist Ukraine to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election.

The recall of the ambassador was a case study in how Giuliani and his allies pursued their goals by sidelining or circumvent­ing the government officials, like Yovanovitc­h and Hill, who were formally overseeing policy toward Ukraine. Hill was kept out of the loop by Giuliani and the president’s allies as they negotiated separately with Ukrainian officials, including on issues clearly in her area of responsibi­lity.

Hill was the first person who worked in the White House to be deposed by House investigat­ors and appeared despite the administra­tion’s declaratio­n last week that it would refuse to cooperate with the impeachmen­t inquiry or allow its staff to do so. The White House did not attempt to stop Hill from testifying, according to the person familiar with her account, but White House lawyers exchanged letters with Hill’s lawyer about precedents regarding the confidenti­ality of presidenti­al communicat­ions.

The House Intelligen­ce Committee issued a lastminute subpoena Monday morning to compel Hill to speak with the investigat­ors, according to an official involved in the investigat­ion. The arrangemen­t was similar to one used last week to secure Yovanovitc­h’s cooperatio­n, allowing both witnesses to more easily justify ignoring the White House’s clear opposition to cooperatio­n with the House inquiry.

Hill, who was described as sensitive to the concerns of executive confidenti­ality, may limit her answers regarding direct interactio­ns with the president. But her testimony has been highly anticipate­d, in part because she has a long history as a skeptic of President Vladimir Putin of Russia who nonetheles­s worked for two years for Trump as he made friendship

Hill

with the Russian leader a high priority.

Hill is a widely respected, British-born former Brookings Institutio­n scholar and intelligen­ce officer. She is the author, with Clifford Gaddy, of “Mr. Putin,” a critical biography of the Russian leader, and she served as senior director for Russian and Eurasian affairs on the National Security Council staff from 2017 until last summer.

She turned over her duties to her successor July 15 and left July 19, just days before the July 25 telephone call in which Trump pressed President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to investigat­e conspiracy theories about Ukrainian help to Democrats in the 2016 election and supposed corruption by former Vice President Joe Biden.

Hill was prepared to testify that she opposed the idea of the phone call because she did not understand its purpose. While it was described as a congratula­tory call after parliament­ary elections in Ukraine, Trump had already made a congratula­tory call to Zelensky in April after his own election.

Hill has told associates that while she was the president’s top adviser on Russia and Ukraine, she was cut out of decisions and discussion­s as Giuliani and others ran a shadow diplomacy intended to benefit Trump’s political position.

She was not told that Trump would use the July 25 call to press for an investigat­ion into Biden nor did she know about the president’s decision to withhold $391 million in U.S. assistance to Ukraine until shortly before her departure, according to the person informed about her account.

Her testimony would not establish a quid pro quo between the suspended aid and Trump’s pressure for investigat­ions, the person said. But she would confirm that the administra­tion leveraged a coveted White House invitation for Zelensky to a commitment to investigat­e corruption, which was seen as code for investigat­ing Democrats.

Hill took her objections to the treatment of Yovanovitc­h, who was targeted by Giuliani and conservati­ve media outlets, to John Bolton, then the national security adviser, as well as others. Bolton shared her concerns, according to the person, and was upset at Giuliani’s activities, which Hill viewed as essentiall­y co-opting U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States