The Mercury News

SB 1 funds are not going to be transferre­d to other issues

- Gary Richards Columnist Look for Gary Richards at Facebook.com/mr.roadshow or contact him at mrroadshow@bayareanew­sgroup.com or 408-920-5335.

Q I was a little surprised to see your column and read that SB 1 funds are being transferre­d to other causes rather than transporta­tion.

That is certainly not the case; the funds have not been transferre­d to serve other purposes. SB 1 is a transporta­tion bill and has already made a positive impact for our highways and local roads to the tune of about $5 billion a year.

And the bill also benefits intercity rail, transit services, and bicyclists and pedestrian­s.

— Matt Rocco, Caltrans public affairs division chief

A And …

Q I saw your column that says the governor is floating an idea to take money away from transporta­tion to give it to other causes. Passing along the governor’s Oct. 16 comments in San Francisco on transporta­tion projects funded through SB 1:

Reporter question: “On gas tax SB 1, you have Republican­s complainin­g of a bait and switch with regard to some of the funding.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom: “I’m confused by it, I think they’re conflating things. Some of them are doing it, respectful­ly, intentiona­lly. But SB 1 is locked in, that money is used for its intended purposes, period, full stop. One cannot legally redirect those dollars. We have a ‘fix it first’ framework. So a lot of confusion out there for, I think, you know, different political reasons and it’s unfortunat­e.

“As it relates to the larger issue, this state invests about $17 billion a year on transporta­tion. We’ve never had more abundance in funding and so transporta­tion is a top priority, maintenanc­e is a top priority and when we have discretion­ary dollars that are set aside as discretion­ary, we want to be thoughtful about how we use those dollars and plan in a way consistent with our values, particular­ly our climate values.

“That’s the whole thing. It’s complicate­d because we are a nation state, but it’s not very complicate­d because we made commitment­s to the voters and we’re keeping them.”

— Garin Casaleggio, deputy secretary, communicat­ions and strategic planning, California State Transporta­tion Agency

A Yes, it is true that all money from Senate Bill 1 is earmarked for transporta­tion. But there is other transporta­tion funding that can be shifted around in ways that are not popular with voters. I did not mean to imply that SB 1 funding could be moved around at will, and do understand how my answer could have been read that way.

Q For years now I’ve driven Santa Teresa Boulevard from Morgan Hill into South San Jose. There is a wicked stretch north of the intersecti­on of Bailey Avenue and Santa Teresa that is in terrible condition. It is a miserable drive.

I wonder why it has not been addressed. We used to chuckle and make jokes about it, but it is no longer amusing. In fact, I consider it hazardous.

— Joanne Sholes

A More paving work is coming, hopefully, very soon.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States