The Mercury News

Watchdog to find Russia probe valid.

- By Eric Tucker

WASHINGTON >> The Justice Department’s internal watchdog will release a highly anticipate­d report today that is expected to reject President Donald Trump’s claims that the Russia investigat­ion was illegitima­te and tainted by political bias from FBI leaders. But it is also expected to document errors during the investigat­ion that may animate Trump supporters.

The report, as described by people familiar with its findings, is expected to conclude there was an adequate basis for opening one of the most politicall­y sensitive investigat­ions in FBI history and one that Trump has denounced as a witch hunt. It began in secret during Trump’s 2016 presidenti­al run and was ultimately taken over by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The report comes as Trump faces an impeachmen­t inquiry in Congress centered on his efforts to press Ukraine to investigat­e a political rival, Democrat Joe Biden — a probe

Trump also claims is politicall­y biased.

Still, the release of Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s review is unlikely to quell the partisan battles that have surrounded the Russia investigat­ion for years. It’s also not the last word: A separate internal investigat­ion continues, overseen by Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, and led by a U.S. attorney, John Durham. That investigat­ion is criminal in nature, and Republican­s may look to it to uncover wrongdoing that the inspector general wasn’t examining.

Trump tweeted Sunday: “I.G. report out tomorrow. That will be the big story!”

He previously said that he was awaiting Horowitz’s report but that Durham’s report may be even more important.

Horowitz’s report is expected to identify errors and misjudgmen­ts by some law enforcemen­t officials, including by an FBI lawyer suspected of altering a document related to the surveillan­ce of a former Trump campaign aide. Those findings probably will fuel arguments by Trump and his supporters that the investigat­ion was flawed from the start.

But the report will not endorse some of the president’s theories on the investigat­ion, including that it was a baseless “witch hunt” or that he was targeted by an Obama administra­tion Justice Department desperate to see Republican Trump lose to Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016.

It also is not expected to undo Mueller’s findings or call into question his conclusion that Russia interfered in that election in order to benefit the Trump campaign and that Russians had repeated contacts with Trump associates.

Some of the findings were described to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity by people who were not authorized to discuss a draft of the report before its release. The AP has not viewed a copy of the document.

It is unclear how Barr, a strong defender of Trump, will respond to Horowitz’s findings. He has told Congress that he believed “spying” on the Trump campaign did occur and has raised public questions about whether the counterint­elligence investigat­ion was done correctly.

The FBI opened its investigat­ion in July 2016 after receiving informatio­n from an Australian diplomat that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoul­os, had been told before it was publicly known that Russia had dirt on the Clinton campaign in the form of thousands of stolen emails.

By that point, the Democratic National Committee had been hacked, an act that a private security firm — and ultimately U.S. intelligen­ce agencies — attributed to Russia. Prosecutor­s allege that Papadopoul­os learned about the stolen emails from a Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud. Papadopoul­ous pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about that interactio­n.

The investigat­ion was taken over in May 2017 by Mueller, who charged six Trump associates with various crimes as well as 25 Russians accused of interferin­g in the election.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States