The Mercury News

Trump’s new court policies inhibit attorney access

- By Kathleen Kavanagh and Valerie Anne Zukin Kathleen Kavanagh and Valerie Anne Zukin are attorneys with the California Collaborat­ive for Immigrant Justice.

In recent weeks, the Trump administra­tion has intensifie­d its assault on immigrant rights with several new moves to limit access to counsel.

Immigratio­n court is already a starkly unbalanced system where mostly unrepresen­ted noncitizen­s — many non-English speakers who may lack formal education — are expected to present their own deportatio­n defenses against trained Department of Homeland Security prosecutor­s. A prominent immigratio­n judge has referred to deportatio­n proceeding­s as “death penalty cases in a traffic court setting.”

The stakes in immigratio­n court are especially high and the chances of finding a lawyer are especially low for detained noncitizen­s, a population that comprises recently arrived asylum-seekers as well as long-term U.S. residents including lawful permanent residents. In fiscal year 2018, representa­tion rates nationally for detained individual­s were just under 35%, with local rates even lower (29.4%).

The California Collaborat­ive for Immigrant Justice is a coalition of pro bono legal services providers serving noncitizen­s detained in the San Francisco Immigratio­n Court jurisdicti­on — an area that spans from Bakersfiel­d to the Oregon border. Detained noncitizen­s are particular­ly vulnerable due to economic and geographic obstacles and low representa­tion rates. Limited-scope legal services provided by CCIJ — including consultati­ons, advocacy in court and referrals to pro bono attorneys — are often the only legal assistance local detained noncitizen­s receive during the entirety of their detention and deportatio­n.

Recent changes by the Executive Office for Immigratio­n Review,

the Department of Justice branch that houses the immigratio­n courts, are further limiting opportunit­ies for detained noncitizen­s to access legal assistance.

For example, a policy memo published late last month has levied new limits on the ability of pro bono attorneys to serve as “friends of the court” in immigratio­n court.

Pro bono “friends of the court” provide a lifeline to detained noncitizen­s from Northern California, offering free consultati­ons and answering questions, helping to raise legal challenges or questions before the judge, and providing followup assistance to detainees and their families. These consultati­ons connect detainees with additional legal resources and sometimes even long-term representa­tion.

The new policy limiting “friends of the court” purports to protect noncitizen­s but in reality, it leaves unrepresen­ted noncitizen­s detained locally more vulnerable — without access to a cadre of experience­d, vetted and free attorneys.

Another recent EOIR policy shift has placed limits on a national program that matches noncitizen­s whose immigratio­n cases are on appeal with pro bono representa­tion. Earlier this fall, EOIR stopped cooperatin­g with the project by ceasing to provide access to case records and rescinding a policy that allowed the program a brief extension of time on cases it placed for representa­tion.

These recent moves to hinder access to pro bono attorneys are part of the Trump administra­tion’s assault on due process and access to counsel for noncitizen­s.

On other fronts, the administra­tion is bringing the issue of whether immigrant advocacy may be criminaliz­ed to the Supreme Court, and last winter it was exposed that the U.S. government was tracking immigratio­n lawyers on the southern border. Locally, the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California requested a temporary restrainin­g order against U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t on behalf of nonprofit immigratio­n lawyers who were told they would be denied access to some noncitizen­s picked up in raids announced last July.

As new policies further inhibit access to advice and counsel in immigratio­n proceeding­s, CCIJ is making necessary changes to our programs while voicing our disagreeme­nt and actively resisting these latest attacks. We refuse to stand by as detained noncitizen­s face “death penalty cases in a traffic court setting” without access to counsel or protection of their due process rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States