The Mercury News

$100B transporta­tion measure on hold over coronaviru­s.

One-cent sales tax hike initiative needed state OK to be on fall ballot

- By Nico Savidge nsavidge@bayareanew­sgroup.com

The campaign for a $100 billion “mega measure” funding big investment­s in Bay Area public transporta­tion is being put on hold amid the disruption to public life being caused by the coronaviru­s, backers have announced.

Faster Bay Area, a campaign asking voters to approve a 1-cent sales tax increase that leaders say will pay for transforma­tive public transit projects, is dropping its plan to put that measure on the November ballot. The campaign, led by business and urban planning groups, will instead try to pass the measure in an unspecifie­d future election.

The reason: The Faster Bay Area campaign needed to get approval by June from twothirds of the Legislatur­e, as well as Gov. Gavin Newsom, for its measure to appear on ballots across the Bay Area’s nine counties this fall.

“Under normal circumstan­ces, this was a very challengin­g task,” campaign officials said in a statement last week. “These are not normal circumstan­ces.

“Considerin­g the uncertaint­y of the legislativ­e season, the urgent need to focus all our attention on immediate challenge of COVID-19 and the complexity of what we are trying to accomplish with FASTER, it has been determined that we need to push out beyond the 2020 election cycle and continue our efforts

on a different time frame.”

Backers plan to keep working on legislatio­n that would authorize the measure at some point in the future.

Led by business organizati­ons Silicon Valley Leadership Group and the Bay Area Council, as well as the urban planning think tank SPUR, the campaign was inspired by similar transporta­tion funding taxes in Seattle and Los Angeles.

The goal was ambitious: create a “world-class, seamless, integrated transit system” across the entire Bay Area from what is now a fractured network of poorly coordinate­d local public transporta­tion agencies,

giving commuters more efficient options that free them from the traffic that chokes the Bay Area, or at least did in the days before working from home and social distancing became the norm.

After the campaign was announced last summer, public transit agencies and supporters had plenty of big ideas for how they wanted to spend the $100 billion the measure would raise over 40 years, such as a second transbay tube for BART or more frequent Caltrain service.

But while Faster Bay Area leaders downplayed the results of a spring primary election in which voters in three Bay Area counties rejected smaller local transporta­tion sales tax proposals, that outcome signaled that the “mega measure” could have a hard time winning the two-thirds majority it would need to pass.

Taxpayer advocates already were bristling at the idea.

And it drew criticism from a coalition of progressiv­e and pro-transit groups, which shared the Faster campaign’s goal of improving public transporta­tion but launched their own campaign for a measure funded with new levies aimed at businesses and the wealthy, rather than a sales tax.

“Of course, this pandemic changes everything, and a transporta­tion funding measure may not make sense to put on the ballot this year,” said Hayley Currier, policy advocacy manager for the group TransForm, an organizati­on belonging to the coalition, Voices for Public Transporta­tion.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States