The Mercury News

Free pass on emissions

Thousands allowed to bypass environmen­tal rules, report finds

-

Thousands of oil and gas operations, government facilities and other sites won permission to stop monitoring for hazardous emissions or otherwise bypass rules intended to protect health and the environmen­t because of the coronaviru­s outbreak, The Associated Press has found.

The result: approval for less environmen­tal monitoring at some Texas refineries and at an army depot dismantlin­g warheads armed with nerve gas in Kentucky, manure piling up and the mass disposal of livestock carcasses at farms in Iowa and Minnesota, and other risks to communitie­s as government­s eased enforcemen­t over smokestack­s, medical waste shipments, sewage plants, oilfields and chemical plants.

The Trump administra­tion paved the way for the reduced monitoring on March 26 after being pressured by the oil and gas industry, which said lockdowns and social distancing during the pandemic made it difficult to comply with anti-pollution rules. States are responsibl­e for much of the oversight of federal environmen­tal laws, and many followed with leniency policies of their own.

AP’s two-month review found that waivers were granted in more than 3,000 cases, representi­ng the overwhelmi­ng majority of requests citing the outbreak. Hundreds of requests were approved for oil and gas companies. AP reached out to all 50 states citing open-records laws; all but one, New York, provided at least partial informatio­n, reporting the data in differing ways and with varying level of detail.

Almost all those requesting waivers told regulators they did so to minimize risks for workers and the public during a pandemic — although a handful reported they were trying to cut costs.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency says the waivers do not authorize recipients to exceed pollution limits. Regulators will continue pursuing those who “did not act responsibl­y under the circumstan­ces,” EPA spokesman James Hewitt said in an email.

“We believe that by taking these measures, we can do our part to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus.” — Tim Peterkoski, environmen­tal auditing and processes manager for Marathon Petroleum

But environmen­talists and public health experts say it may be impossible to fully determine the impact of the country’s first extended, national environmen­tal enforcemen­t clemency because monitoring oversight was relaxed. “The harm from this policy is already done,” said Cynthia Giles, EPA’s former assistant administra­tor under the Obama administra­tion.

EPA has said it will end the COVID enforcemen­t clemency this month.

Refinery giant Marathon Petroleum, already struggling financiall­y before the pandemic, was one of the most aggressive in seeking to dial back its environmen­tal monitoring. On the same day EPA announced its new policy, the Ohio-based company asked Indiana officials for relief from its leak detection, groundwate­r sampling, spill prevention, emissions testing and hazardous waste responsibi­lities at its facilities statewide.

“We believe that by taking these measures, we can do our part to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus,” Tim Peterkoski, environmen­tal auditing and processes manager for Marathon Petroleum, told the Indiana Department of Environmen­tal Management.

Marathon also pushed for and was granted permission to skip environmen­tal tests at many of its refineries and gas stations in California, Michigan, North Dakota and Texas.

Spokesman Jamal Kheiry said Marathon sought broad regulatory relief early in the pandemic, when it was uncertain how long lockdowns would last or how its operations would be affected. But the company continued emissions monitoring and other activities and usually met deadlines, he said.

Penny Aucoin, a resident of New Mexico’s

oil-rich Permian Basin, said since the pandemic, she and her husband have spent days begging regulators to investigat­e surges of noxious gas or hisses that they feared could signal a dangerous leak from one of the many oil and gas companies operating near their mobile home.

“There’s nobody watching,” Aucoin said. “A lot of stuff is going wrong. And there’s nobody to fix it.”

Maddy Hayden, New Mexico’s environmen­tal spokespers­on, said her agency stopped in-person investigat­ions of citizen air-quality complaints from March to May to protect staff and the public but stood ready to respond to emergencie­s.

Almost every state reported fielding requests from industries and local government­s to cut back on compliance. Many were for activities like delaying in-person training or submitting records by email rather than paper. Others, however, were requests for temporary exemptions or extensions on monitoring and repairs to stop the flow of harmful soot, toxic compounds, diseasecar­rying contaminan­ts or heavy metals, AP found.

Regulators, for example, waived inperson inspection­s at parts of a former nuclear test site in Nevada, switching to drive-by checks.

North Carolina allowed Chemours Co., which is cleaning up dangerous PFAS industrial compounds in drinking water, to pause sampling of residentia­l wells because it would require entering elderly residents’ homes.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Marathon Petroleum was one of the most aggressive in seeking to dial back its environmen­tal monitoring. It sought relief from leak detection, groundwate­r sampling, spill prevention, emissions testing and hazardous waste responsibi­lities.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Marathon Petroleum was one of the most aggressive in seeking to dial back its environmen­tal monitoring. It sought relief from leak detection, groundwate­r sampling, spill prevention, emissions testing and hazardous waste responsibi­lities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States