The Mercury News

Could California’s Legislatur­e return for special session?

- By Nico Savidge nsavidge@bayareanew­sgroup.com

After the state Legislatur­e’s shortened session came to a end this week, Gov. Gavin Newsom left the door open to calling lawmakers back for a special session.

After the state Legislatur­e’s coronaviru­s-shortened session came to a chaotic end this week, Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday left the door open to calling lawmakers back for a special session. But while they have plenty of unfinished business, the likelihood of legislator­s returning to Sacramento this fall is unclear.

Bills meant to ease the state’s housing crisis, overhaul policing and provide help to people affected by COVID-19’s economic downtown never made it out of the Legislatur­e by its deadline of midnight Tuesday, leaving a broad sense of disappoint­ment from lawmakers and advocates.

Some proposals failed painfully close to the finish line. Bills that would have allowed duplexes to be built on single-family lots, and expanded public access to police misconduct records, passed both houses of the Legislatur­e but died because they couldn’t get the final votes they needed following late amendments.

Combine that dissatisfa­ction with what advocates say is an urgent need for relief for people struggling amid the pandemic, and there have been rumblings for weeks about whether the governor should order the unusual session.

Asked about the possibilit­y during a press conference Wednesday, Newsom said, “If necessary I’m open to that.”

Still, it wasn’t clear what the governor would consider “necessary,” and he stopped well short of saying he wanted such a session.

“Working with legislativ­e leaders, we’ve had many discussion­s over the course of the last number of months — there were some procedural issues” at the end of the session, Newsom said.

But he also noted that an extraordin­ary session would have to focus on a specific topic — Jerry Brown, for instance, called them while he was in office for health care and transporta­tion bills.

“I’m always open to (a special session), but that’s based upon a specific agenda, a specific criteria, and necessity, as it relates to any of those ideas,” Newsom said.

Some lawmakers are clamoring for more time in Sacramento this fall — 20 Republican Assembly members and senators signed on to a letter Monday from Asm. Kevin Kiley, R-Granite Bay, requesting a special session to cover, among other topics, an audit of the state’s Employment Developmen­t Department and “tax and regulatory relief for small businesses” — but it wasn’t clear that the Democrats who control the Legislatur­e shared their urgency.

Interest groups are asking for a special session as well. Labor leaders want one to pass taxes on the wealthy, which they argued in a CalMatters opinion column would fund “an equitable recovery” from the pandemic; several large police unions are seeking one so they can work with lawmakers to craft a “decertific­ation” process that would revoke the badges of officers who commit crimes or other serious misconduct.

But requests for comment Wednesday to the Legislatur­e’s leadership and several Bay Area lawmakers asking whether they want to have a special session were greeted with radio silence.

One reason they may be lukewarm: The session would take lawmakers off the campaign trail at the height of election season, when they might be working for re-election or pitching in on party campaigns. Also, legislatio­n like the police records and duplex bills would be back to square one in a special session, needing hearings and committee and floor votes all over again to advance to Newsom’s desk.

 ??  ?? Newsom
Newsom

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States