The Mercury News

UC applicatio­n numbers soar as Cal State takes a tumble

- Sy Teresa Watanabe and Nina Agrawal

The coronaviru­s pandemic has led to a good news, bad news college applicatio­n season, as the University of California drew a record number of applicants for fall 2021 while California State University tumbled — a disparity reflected nationally by robust growth at many selective institutio­ns and struggles at less resourced ones.

Applicatio­ns to UC’S nine undergradu­ate campuses soared to a record 250,000 — a 15% increase over last year, including significan­t rises among California Latino and Black freshmen applicants, according to preliminar­y data disclosed by UC President Michael V. Drake in a meeting with The Times editorial board. Campus-specific data will not be released until early next year.

“For all the challenges and all of the noise about is worth it, we see more people looking to the University of California as a pathway to their future than ever before,” Drake said.

At Cal State, however, applicatio­ns declined by 5% with wide variation among the system’s 23 campuses. Cal State Dominguez Hills, which primarily serves disadvanta­ged students, saw a 17% plunge in applicatio­ns. But they increased by 4% at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, the most selective campus with fewer students who are underrepre­sented minorities, low income or the first in their families to attend college.

So concerned about the disparity, CSU extended its deadline a second time for some campuses.

“The pandemic and the economic crisis have exacerbate­d inequality,” said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, which represents more than 1,700 colleges and universiti­es. “Students with financial resources are turning to selective institutio­ns in record numbers. We have to make sure their less resourced peers join them.”

Admissions experts speculate, however, that two other key factors may be driving applicatio­n patterns this year. Hundreds of campuses, including UC and Cal State, removed standardiz­ed testing requiremen­ts this year as the pandemic severely limited the availabili­ty of SAT and ACT testing opportunit­ies, encourag

ing more students to apply to more institutio­ns. And although economic hardship may have discourage­d some disadvanta­ged students from applying to college, it may have led others to seek out universiti­es with generous financial aid, such as the UC system and top private campuses.

The California data mirror national trends. Applicatio­ns from low-income students and those who are the first in their families to attend college dropped by 7% among the 900-plus private and public campus members of the Common Applicatio­n, a nonprofit organizati­on.

At the same time, selective private and large public colleges saw applicatio­ns increase by about 12%, said Common App Chief Executive Jenny Rickard. Applicatio­ns to less selective private campuses fell by 2% and also declined among small public campuses, which Rickard speculated might be tied to a greater proportion of disadvanta­ged students at those institutio­ns.

Yale, Emory, Duke, the University of Pennsylvan­ia, University of Virginia and University of Michigan all reported gains in students applying to their early decision programs. USC, which does not offer early decisions, already is seeing an “upward trend” in applicatio­ns even though the submission deadline is not until Jan. 15, campus spokeswoma­n Lauren Bartlett said.

Among students themselves, some say the biggest variable in their applicatio­n decisions this year was not having to submit SAT and ACT scores. More than 600 additional campuses removed those requiremen­ts this year because of the pandemic, but UC regents explicitly voted this year to phase out the tests, which they saw as a barrier to equitable admissions.

Cyndy Mcdonald, a Central Valley independen­t college counselor, said removing the testing requiremen­t has made a “huge difference” in encouragin­g high-performing, economical­ly disadvanta­ged students to aim high, she said.

“Removing those test scores as factors puts them on a much more equal footing,” she said.

Research has found that removing standardiz­ed testing requiremen­ts increases applicatio­n rates by up to 10% for the first few years, said Zachary Bleemer, a research associate at the UC Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education. That wellknown effect led UC admission officers to expect a rise in applicatio­ns — but those at UC Irvine and UC Santa Cruz said they were startled by the flood that came in shortly after the system began accepting them Nov. 1.

Drake said he was particular­ly pleased with gains among underrepre­sented students — a nearly 20% increase in California freshmen applicatio­ns among Black students and nearly 11% among Latino applicants — which campuses have worked hard to achieve. But admissions officers will be faced with the enormous task of winnowing the flood of applicatio­ns in a year without test scores, possibly more pass/fails in lieu of letter grades and extracurri­cular activities disrupted by the pandemic.

“It will definitely be a challenge,” said Emily Engelschal­l, UC Riverside director of undergradu­ate admissions. “At the end of the day, the university only gets so many spaces.”

At Cal State, leaders attributed the decline in applicatio­ns to pandemic-related hardships, which prompted them to extend the original Nov. 30 applicatio­n deadline to Dec. 15 and again to January or later for several campuses.

The change in volume of applicatio­ns varied by campus, dropping by as much as 26% among first-time freshmen at Sonoma State and increasing by as much as 9% at Cal Poly Pomona. In part, the numbers reflected some ongoing trends: the recent struggle of several Northern California campuses to attract students from outside their areas because of competitio­n from Southern California, wildfires, limited housing availabili­ty and the high cost of housing.

Other high-demand campuses — including San Diego State, Cal Poly Pomona, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Long Beach and Fullerton — saw gains or were relatively flat.

Cal State admissions officials said that students had expressed anxiety about finances, including paying the $70 per- campus applicatio­n fee. They also cited Zoom fatigue, noting that high school students weren’t able to access the same learning or counseling resources as normal, and many were unsure if they wanted to begin college in a potentiall­y virtual environmen­t.

“A lot of students are like, well, do I really want to go to college and do online learning? Or should I just take a gap year and wait until this pandemic settles down and we can actually return to in-person learning and have a “normal” college experience?” said Jose Padilla, a senior enrollment adviser who does recruiting at Sonoma State.

A lot of the university’s high-touch efforts to recruit students were also difficult to replicate remotely. Padilla said that in normal years, he goes to high schools and holds workshops where 60 or 70 students gather in a room and go through the CSU applicatio­n together.

“This year we did try to do that,” he said, “but when it came to doing it virtually, we would have five to 10 students. … The last thing they want is to sit in front of a computer and hear another person give a presentati­on.”

Luoluo Hong, CSU associate vice chancellor for student affairs and enrollment management, said it was “something to celebrate” that the university received as many applicatio­ns as it did despite the pandemic, recession, and racial unrest this year.

“With that said, I do think we need to be realistic about the challenges our students face,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States