The Mercury News

County approves extra pay initiative

New regulation will apply to large grocery stores and pharmacies

- Sy Maggie Angst

Santa Clara County is joining a growing movement of cities and counties across California to require that large grocery stores offer hazard pay to their employees during the coronaviru­s pandemic.

But because the ordinance is restricted to stores in unincorpor­ated areas of the county, only a small number of workers — if any — will reap any benefits from the new mandate.

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisor­s on Tuesday night unanimousl­y passed a law temporaril­y mandating that large grocery stores in unincorpor­ated areas of the county pay their workers an addi

tional $5 an hour on top of their regular wages to compensate them for continuing to risk contractin­g coronaviru­s while on the front lines.

The law, which will take effect in 30 days, applies to grocery stores and pharmacies with more than 300 employees nationwide and at least 15 employees in unincorpor­ated areas of the county. It will last for 180 days or until the county’s COVID-19 public health emergency is terminated, whichever comes sooner.

When asked how many stores would be affected by the new legislatio­n, Santa Clara County Counsel James Williams said he did not have an official count but suspected the number would be “quite small.”

“There aren’t a lot of businesses in unincorpor­ated areas, period, and especially not larger ones that would meet the size threshold,” Williams said in an email. “The ordinance’s main impact is as a model for other jurisdicti­ons to adopt.”

Earlier this month, San Jose became the first city in Santa Clara County to adopt a measure mandating a pay boost for grocery workers, requiring that large grocers pay workers an additional $3 on top of their regular pay. The county plans to provide the rest of the cities in the county with a copy of its newly-passed hazard pay law in hopes that other cities will follow in its footsteps.

Other California cities such as Oakland, Long Beach and Santa Monica all have passed similar laws, and more than a dozen more cities and counties across the state are considerin­g such moves.

But as the push for hazard pay has spread across the state, it has met resistance from business and trade organizati­ons that represent grocers, most notably the California Grocers Associatio­n.

The organizati­on, which has filed lawsuits against about half of a dozen California cities that have enacted such laws, contends that the mandatory pay increases will cause grocers to take cost-cutting initiative­s to compensate for the additional labor costs. Some of those initiative­s, according to the group, could include closing stores, reducing employee hours or passing along the cost to customers by raising the price of goods.

“Extra pay mandates will have severe unintended consequenc­es on not only grocers but on their workers and their customers,” Ron Fong, president & CEO of the California Grocers Associatio­n, said in a statement. “A $5/hour extra pay mandate amounts to a 28% increase in labor costs. Grocers will not be able to absorb those costs and negative repercussi­ons are unavoidabl­e.”

Pushback from local chambers of commerce and the state’s restaurant trade union forced Santa Clara County to make a few major alteration­s to its hazard pay ordinance since it was initially proposed several weeks ago.

The county significan­tly reduced the number of employees impacted by the law by deciding to only apply it to stores in unincorpor­ated Santa Clara County rather than across all cities in the county. It also dropped a provision of the proposed law that called for applying it to workers in large chain restaurant­s as well.

In a Feb. 18 newsletter, the region’s largest chamber of commerce — the Silicon Valley Organizati­on — touted its advocacy effort as a reason why the county scaled back its hazard pay proposal.

The amendments, the SVO rejoiced, “means that the ordinance would have almost zero impact on businesses and workers in our community.”

The SVO raised concerns that the new law could cause unintended consequenc­es, such as “making food insecurity worse and eliminatin­g thousands of service jobs in the middle of the pandemic.”

A better solution, the group said, would be to accelerate the vaccinatio­n schedule for front line workers, which the county has recently taken steps to do. Beginning Sunday, workers in the food and agricultur­e sectors, education and child care and emergency services will be able to get vaccinated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States