The Mercury News

Guide to how America can bring to life political center

- By Dave Anderson DaveAnders­onedited “Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework” (Springer, 2014) and has taught at five universiti­es.

There were 240 million eligible voters in the United States last fall, and Joe Biden and Donald Trump each got approximat­ely one-third of their votes.

Biden got 34% of these people to cast a ballot for him, Trump 31%. But, because of the math of the Electoral College, Trump would have secured reelection had only a combined 44,000 voters switched to him in Arizona, Wisconsin and Georgia. Moreover, millions who cast their votes for Biden did not do so with passion, and the same holds for Trump.

So it’s probably fair to say that half the electorate was not passionate­ly behind one of the 2020 presidenti­al candidates — the 80 million who decided not to cast a ballot at all, for starters, along with perhaps 40 million who voted for one candidate because they disliked, feared or hated the other one.

The new president and his fellow Democrats newly in control of Congress need to think seriously about these figures. The task is to figure out how to build unity in the country.

“Here’s the deal,” as the president likes to say: Democrats in office need to stop assuming that they must convince Republican­s across the country to agree with their proposals. Perhaps 1 in 10 people who identify as reliable GOP voters will be impossible to turn, because they are going to keep siding with the sorts of radicals who led the storming of the Capitol last month.

Instead, Democrats in power in Washington should start by addressing those Americans who did not vote for Trump last year because they did not vote at all. Many are moderates and independen­ts, Most are what political scientists call “low informatio­n voters.” And a good share are younger than 30.

Democrats next need to think about building support among perhaps 20 million Republican­s who voted for Trump but do not buy his lies about losing only because of widespread election fraud. At the same time, the party must work to firm up commitment­s from those who voted for Biden not because they loved him but because they felt that they had to. The deal, in other words, is not to tell Republican­s they need to get aboard the Democratic ship because it’s the only boat leaving the dock. This is the wrong picture.

In short, building unity will be complicate­d, and therefore talking about it should not be in oversimpli­fied terms. Indeed, it would be totally appropriat­e for Biden to commit to engaging those who stayed home, a solid share of Republican­s who voted against him and those Democrats who voted for him without enthusiasm.

To that end, he may decide it makes sense to support election reform policies at the state or federal level. One example would be bids to end partisan gerrymande­ring in order to increase presidenti­al turnout in very blue and very red states. Many voters in these places now feel their votes for Congress are meaningles­s because they live in districts that are a total lock for one party or the other. Similarly, they may not vote for president either, assuming their choice won’t matter since their state is a sure thing for one of the candidates.

The polarizati­on story the media has hyped in recent years provides the wrong framework for understand­ing what we need from our federal government. Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer need to stop looking at politics in terms of Democratic vs. Republican voters and Democratic vs. Republican politician­s.

It’s time for a more complex, realistic framework for creating a just society.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States