Can UC’s system of haves and have-nots be fixed?

Black and Latinx students are entering college at a far higher rate than ever before, but higher education in America remains racially divided and unequal. And California may well stand at the epicenter of that transformation.

A majority of racially marginalized students are not being educated at research universities, and even when they are, they overwhelmingly enroll in public institutions with big ambitions but limited resources, where affluent white students are few and far between.

How did this occur? The Higher Education Act of 1965 expanded government-funded aid for college students. But over the last half century, government support for public higher education has been substantially diminished.

This shift occurred in tandem with the prohibition of affirmative action policies that once increased the presence of racially marginalized students in the top tiers of the higher education system. The adoption of affirmative action bans in nine states followed declines in the percentage of white students at flagship universities in those states. New waves of Latinx students were then absorbed by regional or less prestigious public universities looking for tuition dollars.

Systematic defunding has hit these schools hardest. Prestigious and predominantly white universities secure disproportionate shares of research grant money, philanthropic donations, full-tuition-paying national and international students, and corporate sponsorships that compensate for diminished support from state legislatures.

We came to understand these dynamics while conducting years of research on finances and student experiences at UC Merced and UC Riverside. These two campuses are doing the lion’s share of the work in the University of California system to serve racially and economically marginalized Californians, yet they have very modest endowments and their budgets are almost entirely dependent on annual appropriations from the state.

Merced and Riverside attract only a small number of out-of-state or international students who bring in generous revenues in comparison with the UC campuses that disproportionately serve affluent white and Asian families, such as Berkeley, Los Angeles and San Diego. Nor are there legions of millionaire alumni lining up to make tax-subsidized gifts to Riverside and Merced. At the end of the 201819 fiscal year, the per-undergraduate-student endowment at Merced (at $6,278) corresponded to roughly 1/25th the amount at UCLA and 1/23rd the amount at UC Berkeley.

Yet these campuses have achieved a lot. For example, Riverside has eliminated class and race graduation gaps within the student body that plague other universities. Merced is a leader in the UC system in sending graduates on to obtain advanced degrees, helping to diversify the professional pipeline.

What could these universities accomplish if they had more funding?

The federal government and the states can reinvest in higher education in ways that focus on racially and economically marginalized students. President Joe Biden has proposed expanding the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, directing COVID-19 relief to public institutions and minority-serving institutions, but it is not enough. Multi-campus state systems like the University of California could also pool and share tuition from out-of-state students. The financial benefit a campus gains from enrolling out-of-state students should be progressively distributed among all schools in a state system, regardless of which campus these students attend.

These are public institutions, after all. It is time to remember that Americans have invested in public colleges as collective goods. Americans would do well to make social mobility and racial equity essential academic goals.

Laura Hamilton is a sociology professor at UC Merced. Kelly Nielsen is a senior research analyst at UC San Diego Extension Center for Research and Evaluation. They are the authors of “Broke: The Racial Consequences of Underfunding Public Universities.” © 2021 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.