The Mercury News

Lurching from crisis to crisis, Congress is addicted to cliffs

- By Carl Hulse

WASHINGTON >> Congress disposed of a looming global economic catastroph­e this week by doing what it does best: not much.

After weeks of a market-threatenin­g partisan staredown, Senate leaders struck a not-so-grand bargain that raised the debt ceiling into early December, just two short months away. If history is any guide, lawmakers will then engage in the exact same fight all over again — and may even end up with yet another BandAid solution.

That kick-the-can-everso-slightly-down-the-road debt deal followed the House’s non-considerat­ion last week of a bipartisan infrastruc­ture bill after a promised vote. The delay meant blowing through a Sept. 30 deadline to keep federal highway programs funded, but not to worry: Congress bought itself a whole month with a temporary 30-day patch that will give Democrats more time to resolve deep difference­s among them over a huge social safety net measure that may or may not come together by Oct. 31.

It all unfolded just as Congress narrowly averted a government­wide shutdown by just hours last week, passing a temporary bill to fund federal agencies through Dec. 2 to give itself more time to haggle over the 12 annual spending bills. That fight will inevitably collide with the battle over the debt limit, the big social policy bill and the infrastruc­ture legislatio­n.

Congress is headed toward more cliffs than Wile E. Coyote.

The House and Senate have a long history of putting off pressing matters until the very last minute, making difficult decisions and casting tough votes only when it is finally and completely unavoidabl­e.

But this current Congress seems particular­ly paralyzed, given ideologica­l difference­s among Democrats holding the barest of majorities and entrenched opposition from Republican­s who are fixated on next year’s elections and see a little legislativ­e chaos as their return ticket to the majority.

“Washington Democrats are proving they cannot deliver,” Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. and the minority leader, declared Thursday on the Senate floor, omitting the fact that he was doing everything in his power to make sure that they did not.

The result is that, rather than strike compromise­s on pressing issues, lawmakers have grown accustomed to agreeing to disagree, skirting politicall­y difficult decisions and choosing a date in the future when they will be forced to try again, often with the same outcome. No household or business could operate that way, but for Congress, lurching from crisis to crisis is a way of life.

On the plus side for senators, the debt ceiling agreement preserved the Columbus Day recess, which includes a Republican retreat scheduled for next week in Florida and other travel planned by senators. But Christmas is in real trouble.

The debt deal surfaced because McConnell, who announced Friday he would not again help Democrats extend the government’s borrowing authority, began to fear that he might have taken his debt-limit intransige­nce too far, straying a bit too close to the edge of a particular­ly daunting cliff.

He feared that the two Democratic holdouts in favor of the filibuster — Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz. — would finally cave to pressure from the rest of their party to approve an exception to the filibuster rules for raising the legal cap on federal borrowing if confronted with an imminent fiscal disaster.

And everyone on Capitol Hill knows that a carveout for one kind of legislatio­n will ultimately become an avenue for every kind of legislatio­n. McConnell, who is also very enamored of the filibuster, knew he had to head off that possibilit­y at all costs.

“His No. 1 priority is to protect his instrument of obstructio­n,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.

Things are so bad that even the bare-bones debt agreement barely came together. Top lawmakers and their aides spent hours haggling over it, and Republican­s struggled to gain commitment­s from their members to clear the way for a vote.

Most Republican­s did not want to be anywhere near the debt-ceiling increase that has come under attack from former President Donald Trump, making it politicall­y radioactiv­e in their eyes. For a time, Republican­s were not sure they could produce the minimum 10 votes from their side to move it along procedural­ly.

In the end, 11 Republican­s, including retiring members with nothing to lose and members of the leadership, bit the bullet and sent the bill forward. It ultimately passed with only Democratic votes and still must be approved by the House before it hits President Joe Biden’s desk. The action is expected next week, mere days before a projected default.

The underlying debt fight is over whether Democrats will raise the debt ceiling through regular procedures or via a more convoluted budget process, a technical distinctio­n so fine that it is surely indistingu­ishable to virtually every American not intimately familiar with the Budget Control Act.

“The debt ceiling debate is absurd with a capital A,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, DOre., who leads the Finance Committee.

But it does have political implicatio­ns for both parties.

And Republican­s want Democrats to own the debt and then hammer them on it in next year’s midterms; Democrats want Republican­s to take responsibi­lity for spending during the Trump era, when Republican­s controlled Congress, and to avoid the hammering they are certain to get.

“I have no words to describe how ridiculous it is that the debt ceiling has become a political tool,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich, DN.M. “I just hope we don’t get to the point where Republican­s actually push us over the limit and people’s retirement­s disappear in order for them to sober up.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States