The Mercury News

Incumbents could face reelection challenges under draft congressio­nal maps

- By Seema Mehta and John Myers

Several California members of Congress could face uphill battles to remain in office under draft political maps just released, with some incumbents drawn into the same districts and others possibly forced to run in areas where their party trails in voter registrati­on.

The political muscle of Latino voters appears to be strengthen­ed under the California Citizens Redistrict­ing Commission’s proposed maps — a reflection of demographi­c changes in the state since the current congressio­nal and legislativ­e districts were drawn a decade ago. More than a dozen congressio­nal districts were mapped to include significan­t Latino voting population­s.

Commission­ers conceded that the maps were imperfect and will likely change notably in the coming weeks.

“I have a laundry list of areas that I think will need a lot of refinement,” said Commission­er Sara Sadhwani.

Many details about the proposed districts were difficult to discern because of the lack of informatio­n released by the commission before their unanimous vote Wednesday evening to approve them. Low-resolution draft maps that staff members posted online were hard to read and the district lines were covered with large titles. Higher-resolution maps were posted in the evening, giving the public little time to examine them before the vote.

After creating equal-sized congressio­nal districts of about 761,000 people, the commission’s next priority is abiding by the Voting Rights Act to make sure minorities are not disenfranc­hised. However, data about racial and ethnic breakdown of eligible voters per district weren’t released before the vote.

“How can they say the VRA is being honored with that level of detail? You can’t,” said GOP redistrict­ing expert Matt Rexroad. “The whole process is supposed to be open and transparen­t.”

The approval of the draft maps by the 14-member independen­t commission kicks off a two-week window for public review. Final maps must be submitted to state elections officials before the end of December — a process that was pushed back by more than three months after a historic delay in final census data. Candidates must file for office by midMarch with primary elections held in June.

The commission’s work to redraw districts for the U.S. House of Representa­tives carries implicatio­ns far beyond the state’s borders. For the first time in history, California is losing a congressio­nal seat because the 2020 U.S. Census showed it did not grow as fast as other regions. The state’s delegation, which will have 52 members after the 2022 midterm election, will remain the largest in the nation.

Republican­s are increasing­ly confident about retaking control of Congress in 2022, and California is viewed as vital to that effort. While the state is overwhelmi­ngly Democratic, it is home to millions of GOP voters. In 2018, Democrats flipped seven districts, but two years later, Republican­s recaptured four of them.

Because of the lack of details released, it is impossible to predict party line breakdowns of the proposed districts. Early analysis suggests that incumbents from both parties could face challenges, but for different reasons.

The reelection prospects for Democratic Reps. John Garamendi of Walnut Grove and Josh Harder of Turlock may have grown more difficult because of proposed changes to district lines in their respective regions. Republican­s Devin Nunes of Tulare and David Valadao of Hanford may have had their residences drawn into the same district, though members of Congress are not required to live in their districts.

GOP Rep. Mike Garcia, who won his northern Los Angeles County seat by a little more than 300 votes in 2020, may lose the Republican stronghold of Simi Valley.

Population shifts will also impact races. Districts drawn a decade ago led to five Democrats elected to Congress in districts stretching from Sacramento to Fresno. The draft maps envision only three districts in that same geographic area.

The commission drawing the new districts consists of five Democrats, five Republican­s and four unaffiliat­ed voters selected by state auditors under rules establishe­d by voter-approved constituti­onal amendments. In addition to congressio­nal districts, the panel is charged with redrawing maps for the state Legislatur­e and Board of Equalizati­on. It reviewed nearly 15,000 recommenda­tions, critiques and pleas through testimony, letters and online input.

Commission­ers, staff and outside consultant­s prepared multiple sketches of districts before diving into community-by-community changes during public hearings, often testy, that began Sunday.

“Basically what we’re saying is the map is currently a hot mess. Is that correct?” Sadhwani said during a Monday hearing.

Meetings have grown tense as commission­ers weighed the conflictin­g priorities of various interest groups seeking to reimagine district lines. The effort was especially challengin­g for congressio­nal districts that, under federal law, must be almost exactly equal in population.

Paul Mitchell, a Democratic redistrict­ing expert, said the commission needs to be aware that a major factor in the state losing a congressio­nal seat is the decline in the white population.

“The remedy can’t be to eliminate a minority seat,” he said, adding that there are questions about whether Latinos are getting enough of a voice in Orange and Los Angeles counties, and Asian Americans in the San Gabriel Valley. “These drafts show they still have a long way to go.”

The draft maps appeared to offer no new benefit to Republican­s seeking a seat in the California Legislatur­e. State Senate and Assembly districts are all but certain to keep Democrats firmly in control of both houses in Sacramento.

While legislativ­e maps offered the commission more leeway than those drawn for House districts in divvying up population, the sketches offer visual proof of how relatively slow population growth in the northern part of the state has resulted in a southward shift in political power. Absent major changes to the maps by next month, many Northern California­ns would face longer drives to meet with their elected officials, while delegation­s from Southern California would likely expand their dominance at the state Capitol.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States