The Mercury News

China’s Olympic abuses deserve disdain, disgust

- By Dustin Carmack Dustin Carmack is a research fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Technology Policy. © 2022 Tribune Content Agency.

Former NBC sportscast­er Bob Costas called it perfectly. The Internatio­nal Olympic Committee’s decision to award China the 2022 Winter Olympics deserves nothing but “disdain and disgust.”

That’s because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has earned the world’s disgust, if only for its ongoing genocide of the Uyghurs and other crimes against humanity. This is not a matter of politics. It’s a matter of human rights. But apparently, at IOC headquarte­rs, money matters more than human rights.

At the very least, you’d think the IOC would be interested in protecting the rights and freedoms of Olympic athletes. Now that they are in Beijing, the athletes are under the all-seeing eye of an extensive digital surveillan­ce system. The party says it’s to ensure their safety and to control the spread of COVID-19.

Right.

Let’s take a look at what that actually means for the athletes of the 90 nations participat­ing in the Winter Games.

All attendees and participan­ts are required to download a state-owned (i.e., CCP-owned) app, My2022. Digital researcher­s at the University of Toronto’s The Citizen Lab warn that the app is so riddled with cybersecur­ity risks, it may even violate China’s own recently implemente­d data security law.

Additional­ly, researcher­s found that the app marks approximat­ely 2,442 political keywords for censorship. Phrases like “Xi Jinping,” “Dalai Lama,” “Tiananmen Square Massacre” and “China has no human rights” are all described in the app’s supposedly dormant codebase as “illegalwor­ds.tx.” The practical use of this blacklist remains unclear, but there is one common thread: All of these are politicall­y sensitive terms that thousands of travelers from around the world could use to expose the CCP’s vast abuses.

In recent days, another researcher reverse engineered the app on Apple iOS and Android and came to a troubling, albeit not shocking, conclusion: “I can definitive­ly say all Olympian audio is being collected, analyzed and saved on Chinese servers using tech from USA blackliste­d AI Firm iFLYTEK.”

That firm was associated with 27 other Chinese entities placed on the Department of Commerce’s list of Chinese businesses and individual­s “implicated in human rights violations and abuses in the implementa­tion of China’s campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillan­ce against Uighurs , Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups.”

iFLYTEK can use “voiceprint­s” to identify individual­s through broader databases and has been accused of being used by Xinjiang authoritie­s to monitor and suppress Uyghur Muslims.

For the sake of argument, let’s suppose the app’s potential for invasive surveillan­ce is not as serious as we think. The danger doesn’t end with the My2022 and iFLYTEK. Chinese law says that all citizens and businesses “shall” cooperate and provide anything required or requested from Chinese government and intelligen­ce services and “that all network operators must provide data to, and anything requested by, national, military or public security authoritie­s.”

While those attending the Olympics must stay vigilant of constant surveillan­ce during their visit, that experience is the dayto-day reality of the Chinese people under President Xi Jinping’s CCP.

Xi and the CCP hope that the glamour of the Games and the much vaunted “Olympic spirit” will lead much of the world to turn a blind eye to their ongoing human rights violations and digital authoritar­ianism that reaches far beyond the fields of competitio­n. But the free world can’t afford to check its values at the door when it comes to designing and managing the technologi­es of the future or making a dollar in the global marketplac­e.

During the Games and after the Olympic flame has departed Beijing, it behooves those who believe in freedom of expression, privacy and human rights to speak out against this abusive regime and its pernicious practices.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States