The Mercury News

How California can resolve its transmissi­on lines bottleneck

- By Nora Mead Brownell Nora Mead Brownell is the co-founder of Espy Energy Solutions LLC, an energy consulting firm and a former commission­er of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 2001-2006.

California's grid is stretched to its limits. Power lines in parts of the state already are at capacity. Housing developmen­ts and even a hospital in Humboldt County face indefinite waits to get connected. At the same time, record amounts of wind and solar power are being wasted — almost $650 million worth in 2022 — as the grid just does not have enough capacity to handle the supply. And new fast chargers for electric cars? Approving them takes years as sites often need more capacity than the transmissi­on system can provide. All while demand for power is climbing to feed those new electric cars, trucks and heat pumps.

The Golden State needs a staggering increase in transmissi­on capacity. Experts at Princeton forecast that the state will need to triple its grid capacity by 2050. The bulk of that long term increase will come from the decadeslon­g process of planning, approving and building new transmissi­on lines. California cannot wait that long. The state has virtually no chance of building enough power lines in time to relieve its grid bottleneck.

The cost to build all those new power lines is enormous. California's Independen­t System Operator has approved $7.3 billion in transmissi­on investment­s for the next 10 years while projecting a need to invest over $30 billion in the next 20 years.

There is another way. Adding capacity to the grid does not need to take a decade or longer. Neither does it need to come at an exorbitant cost to ratepayers. New grid enhancing technologi­es can significan­tly increase the amount of power that can be carried over existing transmissi­on infrastruc­ture. At a fraction of the cost of new constructi­on. One of these technologi­es, Dynamic Line Rating, has been proven to expand capacity over existing lines by an average of 30%. That capacity can be delivered quickly — in months rather than years. And at 1/20th the cost to ratepayers.

Utilities in the United States and around the world are successful­ly using these technologi­es. Duquesne Light Co. found 25% more capacity on transmissi­on lines equipped with DLR — enabling it to integrate more renewable energy and support growing demand. In upstate New York, National Grid has installed a DLR system that is enabling an additional 350 megawatts or renewable energy to be used at 1/26th the cost of a build. Grid enhancing technologi­es have been endorsed by the Department of Energy, the chair and former chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the White House.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is right to prioritize building faster. The Golden State is notoriousl­y slow when it comes to green-lighting energy infrastruc­ture projects. Think rush hour on Highway 101 slow. Want to build a solar or wind farm? Approval takes years and 87% of new power projects that are proposed never get built, which is the lowest completion rate for new energy projects in the country. Zero — yes, zero — large scale transmissi­on projects have been approved in California since 2007.

Newsom's proposals to cut red tape and streamline regulation­s to accelerate the building of clean infrastruc­ture are an important step forward. California absolutely needs to speed up the process of approving energy infrastruc­ture projects. But building faster is just not fast enough for California's transmissi­on bottleneck. There is an urgent need to prioritize the use of grid enhancing technologi­es that will provide essential congestion relief in the very near term. At a much lower cost. Embracing these technologi­es will help California rapidly integrate new sources of renewable power into the grid while addressing pressing demands for electricit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States