The Mercury News

Demand from U.N. increases tensions

The U.S. further angers Israel by abstaining from Security Council vote calling for cease-fire in Gaza

- By Edith M. Lederer

The United Nations Security Council on Monday issued its first demand for a cease-fire in Gaza, with the U.S. angering Israel by abstaining from the vote. Israel responded by canceling a visit to Washington by a high-level delegation in the strongest public clash between the allies since the war began.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the U.S. of “retreating” from a “principled position” by allowing the vote to pass without conditioni­ng the cease-fire on the release of hostages held by Hamas.

White House national security spokesman John Kirby said the administra­tion was “kind of perplexed” by Netanyahu's decision. He said the Israelis were “choosing to create a perception of daylight here when they don't need to do that.”

Kirby and the American ambassador to the U.N. said the U.S. abstained because the resolution did not condemn Hamas. U.S. officials chose to abstain rather than veto the proposal “because it does fairly reflect our view that a cease-fire and the release of hostages come together,” Kirby

said.

The 15-member council voted 14-0 to approve the resolution, which also demanded the release of all hostages taken captive during Hamas' Oct. 7 surprise attack in southern Israel. The chamber broke into loud applause after the vote.

The U.S. vetoed past Security Council cease-fire resolution­s in large part because of the failure to tie them directly to the release of hostages, the failure to condemn Hamas' attacks and the delicacy of ongoing negotiatio­ns. American officials have argued that the cease-fire and hostage releases are linked, while Russia, China and many other council members favored unconditio­nal calls for a cease-fire.

The resolution approved Monday demands the release of hostages but does not make it a condition for the cease-fire for the month of Ramadan, which ends in April.

Hamas said it welcomed the move but said the ceasefire needs to be permanent.

“We confirm our readiness to engage in an immediate prisoner exchange process that leads to the release of prisoners on both sides,” the group said. For months, the militants have sought a deal that includes a complete end to the war.

The U.S. decision to abstain comes at a time of growing tensions between President Joe Biden's administra­tion and Netanyahu over Israel's prosecutio­n of the war, the high number of civilian casualties and the limited amounts of humanitari­an assistance reaching Gaza.

The two countries have also clashed over Netanyahu's rejection of a Palestinia­n state, Jewish settler violence against Palestinia­ns in the occupied West Bank and the expansion of settlement­s there.

In addition, the wellknown antagonism between Netanyahu and Biden — which dates from Biden's tenure as vice president — deepened after Biden questioned Israel's strategy in combating Hamas.

Then Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Biden ally, suggested that Netanyahu was not operating in Israel's best interests and called for Israel to hold new elections. Biden signaled his approval of Schumer's remarks, prompting a rebuke from Netanyahu.

During its U.S. visit, the Israeli delegation was to present White House officials with its plans for a possible ground invasion of Rafah, a city on the Egyptian border in southern Gaza where over 1 million Palestinia­n civilians have sought shelter from the war.

Last week, Netanyahu rebuffed a U.S. request to halt the planned Rafah invasion — vowing during a visit by Secretary of State Antony Blinken to act alone if necessary. Blinken warned that Israel could soon face growing internatio­nal isolation, while Vice President Kamala Harris said Israel could soon face unspecifie­d consequenc­es if it launches the ground assault.

The Security Council vote came after Russia and China vetoed a U.S.-sponsored resolution Friday that would have supported “an immediate and sustained cease-fire” in the IsraeliHam­as conflict. That resolution featured a weakened link between a cease-fire and the release of hostages, leaving it open to interpreta­tion, and no time limit.

The United States warned that the resolution approved Monday could hurt negotiatio­ns to halt the hostilitie­s, raising the possibilit­y of another veto, this time by the Americans. The talks involve the U.S., Egypt and Qatar.

Because Ramadan ends April 9, the cease-fire demand would last for just two weeks, though the draft says the pause in fighting should lead to “a sustainabl­e cease-fire.”

The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Linda ThomasGree­nfield, said the resolution “spoke out in support of the ongoing diplomatic efforts,” adding that negotiator­s were “getting closer” to a deal for a cease-fire with the release of all hostages, “but we're not there yet.”

She urged the council and U.N. members to “speak out and demand unequivoca­lly that Hamas accepts the deal on the table.”

Thomas-Greenfield said the U.S. abstained because “certain edits” the U.S. requested were ignored, including a condemnati­on of Hamas.

The resolution was backed by Russia and China and the 22-nation Arab Group at the United Nations.

 ?? CRAIG RUTTLE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? United States Ambassador and Representa­tive to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield holds to abstain her vote as the United Nations Security Council passed a cease-fire resolution in Gaza at U.N. headquarte­rs on Monday.
CRAIG RUTTLE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS United States Ambassador and Representa­tive to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield holds to abstain her vote as the United Nations Security Council passed a cease-fire resolution in Gaza at U.N. headquarte­rs on Monday.
 ?? MAHMOUD ESSA — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Palestinia­ns line up for free food at Jabaliya refugee camp in the Gaza Strip on March 18.
MAHMOUD ESSA — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Palestinia­ns line up for free food at Jabaliya refugee camp in the Gaza Strip on March 18.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States