The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Ban Russia from 2016 Rio Olympic Games

-

The use of performanc­e-enhancing drugs at the top levels of sports is a persistent and intractabl­e problem. But the Russians have raised the sordid practice to an art form, according to an independen­t report released Monday.

Commission­ed by the World Anti-Doping Agency, the report confirms the core accusation­s of Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of Russia’s laboratory responsibl­e for certifying that athletes have not used banned substances. It says that instead of ferreting out cheaters, Rodchenkov was personally involved in a scheme that reached to the top levels of the Russian sports ministry to cover up the use of banned substances by dozens of athletes who competed in the 2014 Sochi Olympics and the 2012 London Olympics, as well as the 2013 World Athletics Championsh­ips in Moscow and the 2015 World Swimming Championsh­ips in Kazan, Russia.

How did they cover up the cheating? In part, by making false assertions that athletes’ tests were clean, according to Monday’s report. When a sample tested positive for banned substances, the deputy minister of sport would determine whether the cheating athlete would be protected or reported.

In what sounds like an episode from the old “Mission: Impossible” television show, the Russians also turned to an agent of the Federal Security Service (a successor to the infamous KGB) to spirit dirty urine samples out of a secured testing room at the 2014 Sochi Olympics, circumvent the supposedly tamper-proof container seals and replace the tainted samples with frozen-and-thawed urine collected before the athletes began doping up.

The investigat­ion by Canadian law professor Richard McLaren was conducted over 57 days — an insufficie­nt amount of time, he said, to identify individual athletes who benefited from the cheating. The antidoping agency has commission­ed McLaren to keep digging and file as complete a report as possible. That’s a welcome step.

Yet the scope of the cheating already revealed means that the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee has a decision to make. With the Summer Olympics set to begin in Rio de Janeiro next month, anti-doping groups are urging a blanket ban on participat­ion by Russian athletes.

The Internatio­nal Associatio­n of Athletics Federation­s, which oversees world track and field athletics, already has barred the Russian team from internatio­nal competitio­ns — including the Olympics — because of a related doping scandal. (Russia has appealed the ban.)

The IOC’s executive committee said Tuesday that it is seeking advice on its legal options, including banning all Russian athletes from the Rio games, and that it is urging the internatio­nal sports community to not schedule any events in Russia. The committee also announced it will not issue credential­s for the Rio games to members of the Russian Ministry of Sport, has created a disciplina­ry commission to review the 2014 Sochi doping tests and will not plan or support any competitio­ns in Russia.

Banning the entire Russian delegation from the summer games raises an interestin­g question about individual versus group punishment, and whether athletes who have not been found to have been doping should suffer for the dirty dealings of others. Collective guilt treads on dangerous ground, and risks denying due process. But as the World Anti-Doping Agency noted, the details in the McLaren report, along with allegation­s by Rodchenkov and others, make it clear that cheating is so rampant within the Russian athletic system — 580 positive tests covered up across 30 different sports — that a presumptio­n of innocence may be misplaced. The IOC should, if its by-laws allow it, ban the entire Russian team from Rio.

Why did the Russians cheat at such an epic scale? Apparently, a misplaced sense of national pride. After what McLaren described as a “very abysmal medal count” at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, the Russians decided to cheat to avoid a similar embarrassm­ent at the 2014 games it hosted on its own territory in Sochi. Russia, unsurprisi­ngly, denies that it has engaged in systematic cheating and has attacked Rodchenkov’s credibilit­y. Yet it also suspended at least four high-level sports ministry officials. It would be naive to think doping is limited to Russia.

It would be naive, too, to think that banning Russia from the games will end the problem. But it would send the necessary message that cheating is unacceptab­le, even if it is just for the sake of a game.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States