An acute case of panic syndrome

The entire politico-media complex had a nervous breakdown last week over President Trump’s position on DACA.

Lawmakers, journalists and activists jumped to all sorts of conclusions when Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced that over dinner at the White House on Sept. 13 they reached an “agreement” with the president over the future of 700,000 illegal immigrants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

There was reason to be skeptical — after all, the story was coming from just one side. But skepticism was in short supply, and even some of those who realized the information was sketchy couldn’t keep themselves from speaking up.

Some Trump supporters instantly assumed the president had sold them out. Some Trump opponents instantly mocked Trump supporters for ever believing his promises.

Democrats wondered what Schumer and Pelosi were doing with the hated president.

Many spoke without enough knowledge to draw any conclusions, or even early conclusions.

The two parties most to blame were Schumer/Pelosi and the Associated Press.

After the White House dinner, the Democratic leaders released a statement saying of their meeting with the president, “We agreed to enshrine the protections of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides.”

A reasonable reader would conclude that the two sides had reached a deal on DACA, with just the border security measures to be worked out later.

But the AP took things a step further, suggesting a done deal. At 9:55 p.m. Sept. 13, the news agency tweeted: “BREAKING: Schumer, Pelosi announce deal with Trump to protect young immigrants; will include border security, but no wall.”

By 11 p.m., Breitbart News ran the headline “AMNESTY DON” above “REPORT: Trump caves on DACA.”

Sean Hannity was skeptical, but still jumped in.

“If reports true 100%,” Hannity tweeted. “I blame R’s. They caused this. They wanted him to fail and now pushed him into arms of political suicide— IF TRUE.”

Meanwhile, as Twitter lit up, Pelosi sent a relatively subdued note to her House Democratic colleagues.

At the White House meeting, she said, “We agreed to a plan to work out an agreement to protect our nation’s DREAMERs from deportation.”

“Agreed to a plan to work out an agreement.”

That’s a classic Washington way of saying the parties haven’t agreed on anything but agree to keep talking in hopes of eventually reaching an agreement. That didn’t stop the ruckus. Nor did much change when, the next morning, Trump made an attempt to quiet things down. “No deal was made last night on DACA,” he tweeted. “Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.”

Later, more members of Congress chimed in with reminders that a DACA deal, if there is to be one, will be made by lawmakers, and not just the president.

What Schumer and Pelosi and Trump laid out were positions in a negotiation that will take place between House, Senate and White House.

But on the night of Sept. 13 and the morning of the 14th, when hair was on fire across Washington and social media, there was no deal and nothing had been decided, except that everyone said they wanted a deal, which is what negotiators always say.

In other words, the whole episode changed pretty much nothing.

Anyone who followed Trump during the campaign knows he is headed toward some sort of accommodation for DACA recipients.

And anyone who follows the Trump administration and Congress knows there will be showdowns on Capitol Hill over the wall and other border security and enforcement measures.

That is where the DACA issue stood before the freakout of Wednesday night and Thursday morning, and that is where the issue stood afterward.

All that panic for no reason. People are on hair trigger these days.

They go off before they know what is going on.

The DACA fiasco should be a lesson.