The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Nonbelieve­rs win suit over Pennsylvan­ia House prayer policy

- By Mark Scolforo

HARRISBURG » A federal judge has halted the Pennsylvan­ia House of Representa­tives’ policy banning people who don’t believe in God from giving the invocation­s made at the start of each day’s legislativ­e floor session.

U.S. Middle District Judge Christophe­r Conner on Wednesday sided with atheists, agnostics, freethinke­rs and humanists who challenged the policy that has limited the opening prayers to those who believe in God or a divine or higher power.

Conner said the restrictio­ns on who may serve as guest chaplain violate the U.S. Constituti­on’s prohibitio­n on making laws that establish a religion.

The judge said Republican House Speaker Mike Turzai, whose office manages the guest chaplains, has denied the people and groups who challenged the policy the ability to give an invocation “due solely to the nontheisti­c nature of their beliefs.”

“In light of this nation’s vastly diverse religious tapestry, there is no justificat­ion to sanction government’s establishm­ent of a category of favored religions — like monotheist­ic or theistic faiths — through legislativ­e prayer,” Conner wrote .

He said it was “the content of the prayers, rather than their theistic or nontheisti­c nature, that matters.”

Turzai and the other defendants had argued the Establishm­ent Clause was not violated because they allowed people of different faiths to give the invocation, so no one religion was being favored.

A spokesman for the House Republican caucus said the decision will be appealed.

The head of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which helped represent the plaintiffs, said the case was about government treating all citizens alike, no matter their religious 23 were rabbis, three were in the Muslim tradition and one was not affiliated with a religion and gave a monotheist­ic prayer.

In recent years, there have been two that were not Christian or Jewish — a Sikh in 2017 and a Native American invocation by a Christian House member in 2015, Conner said.

The plaintiffs said they did not plan to disparage any faith and instead wanted to give an uplifting message, as one of them has done before the start of a Pennsylvan­ia Senate session.

The state House maintained a permanent chaplain to give the opening invocation from 1865 until 1994. Guest chaplains were involved after that, and in 2004 they or incumbent state representa­tives would open the session. About a decade ago, the House began to invite guest chaplains or have the prayer made by lawmakers.

Then-Speaker Sam Smith, a Republican, denied a request in 2014 by a member of the Dillsburg Area Free Thinkers to give the invocation, and House rules were subsequent­ly amended to dictate that all guest chaplains must be “a member of a regularly establishe­d church or religious organizati­on” or a sitting member of the House. The plaintiffs sued in August 2016.

The lawsuit also challenged coercion by House staff to get people to stand during the opening invocation. That policy has since been changed to make standing optional. Conner said the former policy was not constituti­onal but it passes muster under the changes.

 ??  ?? beliefs or lack of belief.“Pennsylvan­ia’s House of Representa­tives failed in that task, and we’re glad the court has set them straight,” said Americans United chief executive Rachel Laser.The lawsuit said 575 of the 678 House sessions over eight years started with an invocation. Non-lawmakers delivered it 265 times: 238 were Christian clergy,
beliefs or lack of belief.“Pennsylvan­ia’s House of Representa­tives failed in that task, and we’re glad the court has set them straight,” said Americans United chief executive Rachel Laser.The lawsuit said 575 of the 678 House sessions over eight years started with an invocation. Non-lawmakers delivered it 265 times: 238 were Christian clergy,

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States