The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Pabst says Miller Coors trying to put it out of business

Pabst says MillerCoor­s is trying to put it out of business

- By Ivan Moreno

MILWAUKEE >> Pabst Brewing Company and MillerCoor­s are going to trial, with hipster favorite Pabst contending that MillerCoor­s wants to put it out of business by ending a longstandi­ng partnershi­p through which it brews Pabst’s beers.

The case has high stakes for Pabst, whose lawyers argue that the company’s very existence relies on the partnershi­p with Chicago-based MillerCoor­s, which produces, packages and ships nearly all its products, which include Pabst Blue Ribbon, Old Milwaukee, Natty Boh and Lone Star. MillerCoor­s, meanwhile, says it’s not obligated to continue brewing for Pabst and that Pabst doesn’t want to pay enough to justify doing so.

The trial in Milwaukee County Circuit Court begins Monday and is scheduled through Nov. 30.

Pabst’s attorneys have said in court documents and hearings that MillerCoor­s LLC is lying about its brewing capacity to break away from Pabst and capture its share of the cheap beer market by disrupting Pabst’s ability to compete. At a March hearing in which MillerCoor­s tried to have the lawsuit dismissed, Pabst attorney Adam Paris said “stunning documents” obtained from MillerCoor­s show that it went as far as hiring a consultant to “figure out ways to get rid of us.” MillerCoor­s has called that a mischaract­erization of the consultant’s

work.

The 1999 agreement between MillerCoor­s and Pabst, which was founded in Milwaukee in 1844 but is now headquarte­red in Los Angeles, expires in 2020 but provides for two possible five-year extensions. The companies dispute how the extensions should be negotiated: MillerCoor­s argues that it has sole discretion to determine whether it can continue brewing for Pabst, whereas Pabst says the companies must work “in good faith” to find a solution if Pabst wants to extend the agreement but MillerCoor­s lacks the capacity.

Pabst needs 4 to 4.5 million barrels brewed annually and claims MillerCoor­s is its only option. It is seeking more than $400 million in damages and for MillerCoor­s to be ordered to honor its contract.

During 2015 negotiatio­ns about extending the contract, MillerCoor­s announced it would close its brewing facility in Eden, North Carolina, and that it eventually might have to shutter another facility in Irwindale, California. Pabst contends that MillerCoor­s refused to provide any informatio­n to substantia­te its claim that it would no longer have the capacity to continue brewing Pabst’s beers, and that it wouldn’t consider leasing the Eden facility and would only sell it for an “astronomic­al” price.

Pabst says MillerCoor­s wouldn’t agree to an extension unless Pabst paid $45 per barrel — “a commercial­ly devastatin­g, near-triple price increase” from what it pays now. At the March hearing, Paris said MillerCoor­s knew Pabst couldn’t accept that proposal “because it would have bankrupted us three times over.”

In court filings, MillersCoo­rs said Pabst’s proposals to keep the Eden facility open “were commercial­ly unreasonab­le” and that Pabst sought “a windfall through litigation” instead of offering to pay enough to keep a facility open. It also said the facility’s closing was “to ensure the longer-term sustainabi­lity” of MillerCoor­s because thousands of new brewers have entered the market over the past decade.

MillerCoor­s and Anheuser-Busch, which have the biggest U.S. market share at 24.8 percent and 41.6 percent, respective­ly, have been losing business to smaller independen­t brewers, imports, and wine and spirits in recent years, according to the Brewers Associatio­n.

“The beer market has shifted and beer lovers are increasing­ly demanding more variety, fuller-flavor, and local products from small and independen­t producers,” said Bart Watson, the Brewers Associatio­n’s chief economist.

Overall U.S. beer sales have declined, with shipments down from 213.1 million barrels in 2008 to 204.2 million in 2017, according to the Brewers Associatio­n.

Pabst depends on MillerCoor­s because the only other U.S. brewer with capacity to make its products is Anheuser-Busch, which doesn’t do contract brewing, Paris said.

“It really is an existentia­l issue for Pabst because it has no real alternativ­es,” Paris said at the March hearing.

Paris said the report from the consultant MillerCoor­s hired in 2013 proves the company never intended to act in good faith. Pabst’s attorneys say the report had sections focused on how to “eliminate Pabst altogether” and noted that MillerCoor­s would need to close two breweries “to be sure they don’t have excess capacity for contract manufactur­ing.”

MillerCoor­s’ attorney, Eric Van Vugt, said in court that the company didn’t rely on the consultant’s report when it decided to close Eden or when it has contemplat­ed closing the Irwindale brewery.

“If we keep Irwindale open, yes, we can supply their beer,” Van Vugt said. “No one disputes that. That’s the only factor that we need to look at.”

 ??  ??
 ?? AP PHOTO/IVAN MORENO ?? Cases of Pabst Blue Ribbon and Coors Light are stacked next to each other in a Milwaukee liquor store. Pabst Brewing Company and MillerCoor­s are heading to trial starting Monday to settle a contract dispute in which Pabst accuses the brewing giant of trying to undermine its competitor by breaking a contract to make their products.
AP PHOTO/IVAN MORENO Cases of Pabst Blue Ribbon and Coors Light are stacked next to each other in a Milwaukee liquor store. Pabst Brewing Company and MillerCoor­s are heading to trial starting Monday to settle a contract dispute in which Pabst accuses the brewing giant of trying to undermine its competitor by breaking a contract to make their products.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States