The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Justice Department presses for census citizenshi­p question

- By Mark Sherman and Jill Colvin

WASHINGTON >> The Justice Department says it will press its search for legal grounds to force the inclusion of a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 census, hours after President Donald Trump said he is “very seriously” considerin­g an executive order to get the question on the form.

Trump said Friday his administra­tion is exploring a number of legal options, but the Justice Department did not say exactly what options remain now that the Supreme Court has barred the question at least temporaril­y.

The government has already begun the process of printing the census questionna­ire without that question.

The administra­tion’s focus on asking broadly about citizenshi­p for the first time since 1950 reflects the enormous political stakes and potential costs in the oncea-decade population count that determines the allocation of seats in the House of Representa­tives for the next 10 years and the distributi­on of some $675 billion in federal spending. It also reflects Trump’s interest in reshaping how congressio­nal districts are drawn.

“You need it for Congress, for districtin­g,” he said Friday. “How many people are there? Are they citizens? Are they not citizens? You need it for many reasons.”

Districts now are based on the total population. Some Republican­s want them based on the population of eligible voters, a change that could disadvanta­ge Democrats by excluding immigrants. The Supreme Court has left open the issue of whether districts based only on the population of eligible voters is constituti­onal.

The Census Bureau’s own experts have said a citizenshi­p question would discourage immigrants from participat­ing in the survey and result in a less accurate census that would redistribu­te money and political power away from Democratic-led cities where immigrants tend to cluster to whiter, rural areas where Republican­s do well.

Trump, speaking as he departed the White House for a weekend in New Jersey, said he might take executive action.

“It’s one of the ways that we’re thinking about doing it, very seriously,” he said.

An executive order would not, by itself, override court rulings blocking the inclusion of the citizenshi­p question. But such an action from Trump would perhaps give administra­tion lawyers a new basis to try to convince federal courts that the question could be included.

“Executive orders do not override decisions of the Supreme Court,” Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educationa­l Fund, said in a statement Friday. The organizati­on is representi­ng plaintiffs in the census lawsuit in Maryland.

Later Friday, Justice Department lawyers formally told U.S. District Judge George Hazel in Maryland the administra­tion is not giving up the legal fight to add the citizenshi­p question to the next census. But they also said it’s unclear how they will proceed, according to a court filing.

“They still say they don’t have clear instructio­ns on what to do,” said Saenz, who took part in a conference call with the judge and lawyers for both sides in one of three lawsuits seeking to keep the question off the census. The other two are in New York and California.

Hazel had expressed mounting frustratio­n with the mixed signals the administra­tion was sending, first telling him on Tuesday that the question was off only to have Trump tweet the next day that the administra­tion was “absolutely moving forward” with efforts to include the question.

Friday American evening, the Civil Liberties Union asked a federal judge in New York to permanentl­y block the administra­tion from adding the citizenshi­p question to the 2020 census.

“The Trump administra­tion repeatedly argued the census forms could not be altered after June 30. They’ve now changed their tune because the Supreme Court ruled against them. They can’t have it both ways,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s voting rights project.

Trump’s administra­tion has faced numerous roadblocks to adding the question, like last week’s Supreme Court ruling that blocked its inclusion, at least for now. Both the Justice and Commerce department­s indicated on Tuesday that they were moving forward with the census, minus the citizenshi­p question.

But Trump has insisted otherwise, pushing his administra­tion to come up with a way to include the controvers­ial query. He suggested Friday officials might be able to add an addendum to the questionna­ire with the question after it’s already printed.

In the Supreme Court’s decision last week, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four more liberal members in saying the administra­tion’s current justificat­ion for the question “seems to have been contrived.” The administra­tion had pushed the Supreme Court to decide the case quickly, citing a July 1 deadline to begin printing the forms. The court made the rare move of taking up the case directly from a trial court in New York before an appeals court had weighed in. As recently as June 20, Solicitor General Noel Francisco reminded the justices of the need for a quick decision, writing that “for all practical purposes, the Census Bureau needs to finalize the 2020 questionna­ire by June of this year.”

The Trump administra­tion had said the question was being added to aid in enforcemen­t of the Voting Rights Act, which protects minority voters’ access to the ballot box.

But the question’s opponents say recently discovered evidence from the computer files of a Republican redistrict­ing consultant who died last year shows that, far from helping minority voters, discrimina­tion against Hispanics was behind the push for the citizenshi­p question.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States