The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Two cheers for the July jobs report — but just two

- Catherine Rampell Columnist

Two cheers for the July jobs report.

Last month the U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs. On the one hand, this number — at least in isolation — sounds pretty big! Until quite recently, we’d never even had a monthly job growth number in the seven figures. On the other hand, it’s a big slowdown from the 4.8 million jobs added in June. More important, you also have to consider how many more jobs were lost in the spring, which was an eight-digit figure (nearly 21 million positions were axed in April alone).

Then you realize that even with the recent growth, the country is still very much in the red.

Total non-farm payrolls are down by a net of 8.4%, the equivalent of nearly 13 million jobs, since the recession officially began in February. The U.S. unemployme­nt rate is 10.2%, still higher than it ever was during the Great Recession. If you also include workers who are involuntar­y part-timers, people who have given up looking for work, and those who are still being accidental­ly misclassif­ied as employed despite being temporaril­y laid off, the underemplo­yment rate would be closer to 17.5%.

Now the Great Recession looks pretty ho-hum when compared with the recently declared pandemic recession.

One of the hopes many economists expressed about this business cycle was that we’d have a sharp downturn, yes, but that it would be followed by an equally sharp bounce-back — that is, the coveted “V-shaped” recovery. We definitely bounced upward quite sharply at first. More recently, though, growth across a range of economic indicators has tapered off. Business closures and layoffs that at first seemed temporary might be becoming permanent, as the country struggles to get the novel coronaviru­s under control and firms are forced to operate with fewer customers and higher costs.

There’s reason to fear that, rather than a V-shaped recovery, we’re approachin­g a “flaccid check-mark” or “reverse squareroot” recovery. Or possibly worse.

That is, we’re at risk of an outright reversal of recent progress, since the virus is still not under control and Congress and the White House have not been able to agree on another round of coronaviru­s relief legislatio­n.

State and local government payrolls looked like they rose in July, but that is an artifact of something called seasonal adjustment — a standard practice by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to account for normal seasonal patterns. From Friday’s BLS report:

“Government employment rose by 301,000 in July but is 1.1 million below its February level. Typically, public-sector education employment declines in July (before seasonal adjustment). However, employment declines occurred earlier than usual this year due to the pandemic, resulting in unusually large July increases in local government education (+215,000) and state government education (+30,000) after seasonal adjustment. A July job gain in federal government (+27,000) reflected the hiring of temporary workers for the 2020 Census.”

Without changes in federal government jobs (which are boosted by decennial census hiring), employment on state and local government payrolls is down about 1.2 million jobs since February.

At the state and local levels, revenue is still way down and demand for services still way up. Many states and municipali­ties just started a new fiscal year, and without further federal help we should expect more layoffs ahead. Job losses at state and local government­s have knock-on effects throughout the private sector, too, since these laid-off workers cut back on spending, government services decline, private contracts get canceled, etc.

In other words, the fact that the July jobs report showed continued growth is not an excuse for Congress to throw up its hands and do nothing. Policymake­rs — particular­ly the Republican­s who have been resistant to further stimulus — need to step up and continue much-needed life support for the U.S. economy. The recovery was slowing even before these recent fiscal time bombs hit; without further interventi­on, things could get much worse.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States