The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Americans must continue war on terror

-

Rooting out global terrorism is not synonymous with imperialis­t hubris.

Rooting out global terrorism is not synonymous with imperialis­t hubris. And those who strive for power through suicide bombings thrive in violent, nondemocra­tic societies, the kinds of places where leaders talk to their people with an AK-47 at their side.

We hope that pair of salient truths are being remembered at the White House as America mourns the loss Thursday of at least 13 American service members, killed along with some 200 Afghan men, women and children by a brutal terrorist attack outside the airport in Kabul, Afghanista­n.

Especially as we approach the 20th anniversar­y of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

On an August day that proved to be the darkest of Joe Biden’s young presidency, the terrorist group known as ISISK claimed credit for the pair of explosions that maimed or killed not just members of the U.S. armed forces working for the safety of others, but Afghans merely trying to secure their own security and freedom from oppression.

Though the day represente­d one of the worst days for U.S. casualties in the entire 20year operation in Afghanista­n, it does not appear to have been carried out by the Taliban, the long-standing adversary in that profoundly flawed campaign. It was the work of a third party, a yet-more-extreme group with a vested interest in underminin­g the Taliban’s apparent victory.

Clearly, the chaos outside the airport in Kabul offered up an ideal proving ground.

When Biden announced Sept. 11 as the end date of the U.S. military’s engagement in Afghanista­n, he was intending to send a signal of some kind of completion to what once was known as a war on terror. A decision made from a position of strength. The brutality of that region of the world has undermined that narrative.

Instead of signaling that the events of 9/11 were in the rearview mirror, Americans have seen the specter of terrorism hurtling back into sight. There might not be direct evidence of planned attacks on U.S. soil, but only a fool would see such a move as impossible.

Thanks to the poorly planned withdrawal and evacuation efforts, ISIS-K did not need to come stateside to find U.S. targets, given that members of the armed forces were trying to get America’s Afghan allies to safety and a better life.

Biden hardly is the only president to blame for this mess. There is no question that President Donald Trump’s intemperat­e deal with the Taliban reduced the options open to his successor. By telegraphi­ng a lack of U.S. will to continue to work with allies to protect freedoms in Afghanista­n, the Afghan government and its security forces were further weakened. Hence the rapid collapse.

So while it’s surely tempting for Republican­s to use this debacle for political gain and to try to render the Biden presidency a single-term affair, the reality is that the mistakes here have been bipartisan. And few Republican­s have openly repudiated the Trump deal.

For centuries, Afghanista­n has been a quagmire for foreign powers. Biden’s belief that it had to end is entirely defensible. But now he has to face, and own, the inconvenie­nt truth that terrorists love to fill a power vacuum. They cannot be allowed to prevail. And the fight against them will need to be waged not just by the U.S., but by its longstandi­ng allies. Biden’s rhetoric needs to become more inclusive of those allies.

U.S. media in recent days has portrayed the long engagement in Afghanista­n as reflective of a naive and hubristic assumption that Western democracy can be exported. Some have portrayed the Taliban as changed rulers, newly dedicated to moderation and willing to respect, say, the rights of girls and women to an education and to full participat­ion in society.

Time will tell there and we think any such possibilit­y will require the judicious applicatio­n of America’s leverage.

But an inconvenie­nt truth blew up Thursday in America’s face. This was the message: There are those to the right of the Taliban who specialize in terrorism.

In Afghanista­n and beyond, the war on terror is far from over. All nations who believe in freedom, safety and democracy will have to reengage. There can be no withdrawal from that.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States