The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Paid family leave bill clears its first hurdle

- By Christine Stuart CTNewsjunk­ie.com

HARTFORD >> The Labor and Public Employees Committee has forwarded to the House a bill that would allow employees to earn up to 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave.

The bill would allow employees to start contributi­ng a portion of their paycheck to a Family and Medical Leave Compensati­on Trust Fund in 2019 and to start using the system by July 1, 2020. The amount of money an employee on leave could receive would be capped at $1,000 per week.

The bill, which passed the committee 8-5 Thursday, has been a priority of Democrats in the House and the Senate. Only one Republican, state Sen. Craig Miner, R-Litchfield, voted in favor of the House legislatio­n.

The other Republican­s on the committee opposed the measure.

“Sometimes we have to look at the times that we’re in,” state Rep. Mike Bocchino, R-Greenwich, said.

He said he wanted to support the legislatio­n because “on its face it’s morally right.” However, he said, at the moment “it just seems to me it’s giving businesses another opportunit­y to exit our state.”

While employers would be mandated to help their employees set up a payroll deduction into the fund, there would be no funding required from businesses.

Employees would be the ones contributi­ng to the fund so proponents of the legislatio­n argue there’s no additional cost to employers, which is why several employers support it. At the same time, large business groups, such as the National Federation of Independen­t Businesses, are against it.

State Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, reminded Bocchino that employers already have to grant employees family and medical leave; it’s just not paid leave.

She said she’s pretty sure after going through childbirth that men would support the legislatio­n and increase the amount of leave available if they had to bear children.

Only 12 percent of private and 17 percent of public sector workers have access to paid leave through their employer, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

“No worker should be forced to choose between their health or family they love and the job they need,” the Connecticu­t Working Families Party said. “Paid family and medical leave will ensure that workers who need to take time off to welcome a new baby, care for an ill relative or recover from a personal illness are not punished financiall­y.”

This year’s legislatio­n would apply to companies with as few as two employees.

If passed, Connecticu­t would become the seventh state to have paid family and medical leave. States providing paid leave are California, Washington, Rhode Island, New Jersey, New York and Massachuse­tts.

Officials from the legislatur­e’s Commission on Women, Children and Seniors applauded approval of the bill.

“As our elected officials work to hone a plan that is both family-friendly and fiscally responsibl­e, momentum continues to build here and nationally,” the commission said. “Paid Family and Medical Leave is progressiv­e legislatio­n that is right for women and their families, smart for business and keeps our state moving forward.”

Andrew Markowski, state director for the National Federation of Independen­t Business, said that if paid leave was such a big priority it should apply to state employees as well as to private businesses.

“Small-business owners cannot afford a new mandate any more than the state can,” Markowski said. “Lawmakers are failing to understand that [starting] up a paid family leave program in the state of Connecticu­t will not only saddle taxpayers with the startup cost, but small employers will shoulder the economic burden of yet another attempt by lawmakers to legislate the day-to-day operation of their businesses.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States