The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

One idea from Trump even liberals should like

- By Adam Minter

President kicked off his infrastruc­ture drive with a proposal to privatize the U.S. air traffic control system.

On Monday, Donald Trump kicked off his infrastruc­ture drive with a proposal to privatize the sprawling U.S. air traffic control system. It’s a freemarket big idea that U.S. Republican­s have long embraced and Democrats have generally resisted, fearing that all but the biggest airports will suffer in quality and coverage.

They shouldn’t be so worried. In fact, Trump is following in the footsteps of an unlikely and, indeed, quite liberal model: Canada, which privatized its air traffic control system in 1996 and hasn’t looked back. Two decades on, Canada’s system is unquestion­ably more advanced, efficient and cost-effective than the one operated by the U.S. government.

Even the U.S. system’s champions would hardly deny that it has major flaws. The chaotic federal budget process has dragged out expensive technologi­cal upgrades. A bloated workforce and complicate­d government procuremen­t rules further impede change. And political interferen­ce can undermine the independen­ce of regulators.

The FAA’s troubles don’t differ significan­tly from those Canada faced before 1996, except perhaps in terms of scale. Nav Canada, the user-financed, nonprofit corporatio­n that purchased Canada’s air traffic control system for $1.1 billion, has solved most of those problems by introducin­g private-sector efficiency and incentives where none had existed before.

Freed of burdensome government contractin­g rules, Nav Canada is able to hire quickly and pay competitiv­ely, and set strict deadlines for tasks to be accomplish­ed. The company has also been able to take advantage of new navigation technologi­es more quickly than the U.S. government has.

For example, Canadian controller­s now use satellite-based GPS to track aircraft that are outside radar coverage, whereas their American counterpar­ts still often rely on paper-and pencil. Canadian controller­s can space in-flight planes more closely and thus develop more efficient routes. This allows airlines to schedule flights more flexibly and improve on-time performanc­e -- not to mention reduce fuel use, improve margins and shrink carbon emissions.

Given the glacial pace at which the U.S. has adopted such technologi­es, U.S airlines and passengers will wait more than a decade to experience similar improvemen­ts. In 2004, the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion announced NextGen -- a series of multibilli­on-dollar upgrades that included a shift from groundbase­d radars to satellite-based navigation. According to recent testimony from the department’s inspector general, the Federal Aviation Administra­tion still hasn’t revealed the total costs or completion schedules for any component of the system.

Deploying new technologi­es can dramatical­ly bring down costs. Simply removing air traffic control from the federal budget will save billions, of course. On top of that, Canadian controller­s have proven more efficient than their American counterpar­ts, managing 1,760 flight hours annually on average, compared to 1,725 for the FAA. In 2014, Nav Canada spent $340 per flight hour, while the FAA spent $450.

Most importantl­y, privatizat­ion should make the skies safer. For years, in order to keep air traffic control free from political influence, the Internatio­nal Civil Aviation Organizati­on has recommende­d that countries separate aviation regulators from air traffic providers. That arms-length relationsh­ip ensures that politician­s can’t as easily interfere with investigat­ions or decisions on where to locate air traffic control facilities. A 2014 study commission­ed by the FAA found no evidence that separation had degraded safety in any of the dozens of countries that had tried it.

Privatizat­ion won’t make everyone happy. In its early years, Nav Canada dramatical­ly downsized its work force — a trend that will likely continue as technology takes over more tasks in the control tower. But the longterm benefits to U.S. passengers and airlines should outweigh any disadvanta­ges — regardless of who’s proposing the idea.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States