The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

We should be deeply worried about NAFTA

- Courtesy of The Washington Post

The NAFTA renegotiat­ions — long promised by President Donald Trump — are about to start. We have never renegotiat­ed a trade agreement before, and this is our largest and most important by far.

There are reasons to be deeply worried about the outcome. Trump’s history on trade and the administra­tion’s declared priorities in reworking the North American Free Trade Agreement create a bleak backdrop for the Aug. 16 launch of renegotiat­ion talks.

The optimists’ playbook on the president has been, “watch his actions, not his words.” We now have had six months of actions — backed up by decades of words — and the verdict is in on Trump and trade: He is the most unorthodox and nationalis­t president of the modern era.

The president’s words on trade could not be more stark. NAFTA is “the worst trade deal in the history of the world,” right up there with the Trans-Pacific Partnershi­p (TPP), “another disaster done and pushed by special interests who want to rape our country.”

Nor are his views recent or lightly held. Indeed, trade — along with his other signature issue, immigratio­n stand out as remarkably stable strands in his worldview. They are two steel rods in the shifting sands of his words and policies, visible through the decades and connecting strongly to Trump’s base. In 1987, Trump spent nearly $100,000 to take out a fullpage ad on trade in The Post and other major newspapers and his words then match his words today.

Since his inaugurati­on on Jan. 20, Trump’s words are becoming actions. In the first week of his presidency, he withdrew from the TPP and announced his intent to renegotiat­e NAFTA. In April, he publicly toyed with pullingthe United States out of NAFTA altogether. He has issued eight executive actions to “protect” us from trade.

And now we have the administra­tion’s long-awaited “Summary of Objectives for the NAFTA Renegotiat­ion.” Our partners in Mexico and Canada hope for straightfo­rward negotiatio­ns as the talks start this month, and even conclusion by year’s end.

Hope is natural, but the realities of the U.S. objectives cannot be overlooked. True, much of the document is straight out of the trade wonk’s script: borrowing from other recent negotiatio­ns, including the TPP (irony of ironies), and “modernizin­g” this 23-year-old agreement.

But what makes the NAFTA objectives - and the upcoming talks - so exceptiona­l, even radical, is the very first objective: “Improve the U.S. trade balance and reduce the trade deficit with the NAFTA countries.” This is new and unique. As the accompanyi­ng news release puts it, “for the first time USTR has included deficit reduction as a specific objective for the NAFTA negotiatio­ns.”

Trump’s single-minded focus on bilateral trade deficits puzzles mainstream economists, whose assessment is that they mean little on their own and instead reflect deeper issues such as savings and consumptio­n rates rather than inherent unfairness. Neverthele­ss, deficit reduction surfaces over and over in the president’s thinking — back to 1987, remember — and it is now officially Objective No. 1, for NAFTA and no doubt all future Trump trade talks.

What impact will Objective No. 1 have on the negotiatio­ns? Well, our trade deficit with Mexico is approximat­ely $60 billion. Although the objectives assert that the United States will seek to reduce that deficit by expanding U.S. exports, Mexico’s economy is comparativ­ely small and its citizens’ and businesses’ purchasing power comparativ­ely limited. Can Mexico afford to buy $60 billion more from us rather than producing it themselves? Voluntaril­y? That equals 6 percent of its total gross domestic product. Doubtful.

There are only three sure ways to reduce a trade deficit as large as Mexico’s, and they would do so by brute force: tariffs, quotas or managed trade, such as the “voluntary” restrictio­ns on Japanese auto and semiconduc­tor imports back in the 1980s. These blunt instrument­s are anathema to the much smaller economies of Canada and Mexico, and indeed to all of our trading partners. Add the issue of the wall, and the outlook can only be bleak.

If the NAFTA talks that begin this week are an “arena” where nations “compete for advantage,” as the president’s aides have described the president’s “clear-eyed” worldview, and the president’s unchanging and unyielding views on trade are now officially Objective No. 1 — then no one should expect a normal negotiatio­n, and no one should rule out collapse.

If the administra­tion surprises and the talks go well, we would wind up with a modernized NAFTA well-suited to the 21st century. But if the talks fall apart, then our relations with our closest neighbors would be shattered, supply lines across our continent sundered, and our borders north and south thickened.North America would enter a new era riven with trade barriers, tariffs and mutual suspicion.

And the winner in all this would be China, no longer competing against a unified and efficient North American manufactur­ing platform and a gigantic internal market. So just as when Trump pulled us out of the TPP and the Paris climate change accord, the global benefactor may well be the very country against whom Trump directed so much of his campaign rhetoric.

Trump wants to put America First. Instead, he may be helping ensure a China Next.

editor @middletown­press.com or call (860) 685-9125 so we can correct our mistake. We are committed to correcting all errors or making clarificat­ions that come to our attention, and encourage readers, story sources and the community at-large to point them out to us. Send an email to factcheck@middletown press.com and let us know if there is more to add or something to correct in one of our stories. Also see our fact check blog http://middletown­press factcheck.blogspot.com for some of our clarificat­ions, correction­s and additions to stories. You can report errors anonymousl­y, or provide an email and/or other contact informatio­n so that we can confirm receipt and/or action on the matter, and ask you to clarify if necessary. Talk with us online: Facebook.com/middletown­press

twitter.com/middletown­press. For photo slideshows and videos from around the world, visit www. media.middletown­press.com.

 ?? NATI HARNIK / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Blake Hurst, a corn and soybean farmer and president of the Missouri Farm Bureau, center, jokes with his brothers Brooks Hurst, left, and Kevin Hurst, right, on his farm in Westboro, Mo. U.S. President Donald Trump has vowed to redo the North American...
NATI HARNIK / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Blake Hurst, a corn and soybean farmer and president of the Missouri Farm Bureau, center, jokes with his brothers Brooks Hurst, left, and Kevin Hurst, right, on his farm in Westboro, Mo. U.S. President Donald Trump has vowed to redo the North American...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States