The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Branches struggle to keep riders on time

- By Bill Cummings bcummings@ctpost.com

Metro-North is under fire for branch line performanc­e that has left some commuters with no more than a 64 percent chance of arriving at work on time.

The Waterbury Line in July was on time 64 percent of the time, while the New Canaan line was on time 78 percent and the Danbury Line 87 percent, a Hearst Connecticu­t Media review shows.

Riders on the Shore Line East Line that runs to New Haven from points northeast of the city was on time only 72 percent of the time in July.

“Performanc­e is affecting ridership,” said Jim Gildea, chairman of the Connecticu­t Commuter Railroad Council.

“When you have a 65 percent chance you will not get to work on time, that’s a problem,” said Gildea, who rides the Waterbury Line. “We have never seen performanc­e this bad.”

Metro-North and state officials acknowledg­ed trains are late and attributed delays to ongoing upgrades of the system and equipment breakdowns.

“The recent trend of late trains on the New Haven Line, including the Waterbury, New Canaan and Danbury branches, has primarily been the result of extensive, ongoing upgrades to our infrastruc­ture,” MetroNorth said in a statement.

In a recent letter to the state Department of Transporta­tion, 12 lawmakers — including state Rep. Themis Klarides, R-Derby and the House Republican minority leader — demanded action and an explanatio­n.

“As you know, on-time performanc­e impacts ridership, when residents don’t feel like they can rely on rail they will take their car into work — again clogging up Connecticu­t roadways,” the lawmakers told DOT Commission­er James Redeker.

“This is clearly shown with an almost 2 percent decrease in ridership when compared to earlier months,” the legislator­s noted. “This is unacceptab­le performanc­e.”

Redeker said commuters will have to live with the delays for now as workers toil to improve the railroad.

“The constructi­on activities that are taking place are necessary and long overdue,” Redeker said. “The service delays to accommodat­e this aggressive rebuilding program will ultimately lead to a more reliable, more comfortabl­e train service.”

Angry commuters

The late trains are drawing the attention of commuters, who are taking to Twitter to vent their frustratio­ns.

“SLE [Shore Line East] is a disgrace, they’re hemorrhagi­ng riders because the state is incompeten­t,” Ray Lucibello tweeted last week.

“Decades of stealing from transporta­tion coming back to haunt them, and now citizens will literally pay for it with expensive tolls [new taxes],” Lucibello added.

Frederick Moore tweeted “What’s the surprise?,” referring to poor branch service.

“When I am feeling paranoid some days I think there is a competitio­n by DOT to see whether @shoreLinee­ast or WBL [Waterbury Branch Line] is the worse commute,” noted E.C. Schroeder in a Twitter post.

The data backs up concerns expressed by commuters.

The Waterbury Line, which runs to Bridgeport, started the year with a 94 percent on time record.

But by May, the on-time rate dropped to 86 percent and in August, riders had a 69 percent chance of making it to work on time. The Line served 312,000 riders last year.

The Danbury Line varied from an ontime performanc­e rate of 85 percent in January to the 90 percent range between March and May, and back to 86 percent in June. The line carried nearly 700,000 passengers last year.

Shore Line East riders had a 72 percent chance of being on time in July, compared to an 88 percent chance in July 2017. The smallest of lines, Shore Line East served just over 1,882 riders last year.

The far larger New Haven Line, which runs from New Haven to Grand Central Terminal, posted a performanc­e rate ranging from a high of 95 percent in April to a low of 82 percent in July. Nearly 37 million riders used the train last year.

There is also some evidence that performanc­e is impacting ridership. For example, year-to-date ridership on the Danbury and Waterbury lines is down by just under one percent when compared to last year. The New Canaan Line is up 1.4 percent.

Improvemen­t and delay

Gildea said the poor performanc­e could have been avoided, pointing out the state promised aggressive improvemen­ts to the Waterbury Line three years ago.

Although the $2.8 million project was supposed to be finished this year, Gildea noted DOT only recently approved money to design the work.

“They lack foresight and vision,” Gildea said of DOT. “There is not enough equipment for the branches, not enough diesels. They have not made the necessary infrastruc­ture investment­s they should make.”

Gildea added “They will say Waterbury or Danbury has not lost that much [ridership] but it takes a few months for ridership to decline. There has been constructi­on and speed restrictio­ns for years now. It’s a smokescree­n masking a more serious issue.”

Judd Everhart, a DOT spokesman, said the reason for the spike in late trains is straightfo­rward.

“Two out of three late Waterbury Line trains are the result of a late train connection from the New Haven Line,” Everhart said.

“The performanc­e on the New Haven Line is the result of an aggressive capital investment program that has taken multiple tracks out of service throughout the 72 miles of railroad between Grand Central Terminal,” he noted.

Everhart said major projects include a track undercutti­ng program in Rye, bridge work in Greenwich and Stamford, replacemen­t of boarding platforms at Noroton Heights and new railroad interlocki­ng in Norwalk.

“These projects are addressing decades of under investment, but have significan­t negative impacts on service,” Everhart said.

“We realize we could have done a better job at getting the word out about the constructi­on program and we are working with Metro-North on a special notice to customers to explain the recent performanc­e and what to expect ahead,” Everhart added.

Metro-North said breakdowns on the branch lines has also impacted performanc­e, as well as constructi­on projects and implementa­tion of the Positive Train Control safety system.

“We have experience­d a decline in the performanc­e of our diesel locomotive­s operating on the Danbury and Waterbury branches.” Metro-North said. “To improve the performanc­e of our fleet, we are beginning a program to overhaul locomotive­s over the next four years.”

The railroad added “We appreciate your patience and understand­ing as we carry out these critical projects. Our track and infrastruc­ture work will not only make our system safer; it is also an investment in the future reliabilit­y of our system, which is something that you rightfully expect and deserve.”

 ??  ?? BRANFORD, GUILFORD, HAMDEN, MERIDEN, MONROE, NEW HAVEN, NORTH HAVEN, ORANGE
BRANFORD, GUILFORD, HAMDEN, MERIDEN, MONROE, NEW HAVEN, NORTH HAVEN, ORANGE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States