The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Dems look to derail Kavanaugh

Sex abuse claim delays Senate committee vote

- By Dan Freedman

WASHINGTON — For Connecticu­t Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and their Democratic colleagues, the last-minute surfacing of a sexual-abuse allegation may do to Brett Kavanaugh what hearings did not: Delay confirmati­on or sink his Supreme Court nomination entirely.

The allegation that Kavanaugh, as a highschool student, held down and groped a teenage girl developed into a full-fledged political firestorm Monday.

The accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, came forward publicly over the weekend and offered to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee — of which Blumenthal is a member.

“What we need now is a full, fair investigat­ion by the FBI that involves witnesses, records and documents and enables the American people to know the facts,” Blumenthal said in an interview Monday.

“There is no question that confirmati­on must be delayed.”

Blumenthal and five other Democratic senators on Monday filed a lawsuit to compel the release of documents by the National Archives and the CIA on Kavanaugh’s years as associate counsel and staff secretary in the White House under former President George W. Bush.

The White House said in a statement that Kavanaugh “looks forward to a hearing where he can clear his name of this false allegation. He stands ready to testify (Tuesday) if the Senate is ready to hear him.”

Late Monday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, RIowa, said the committee would hear from both Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh on Sept. 24.

The committee, Grassley said, would “give these allegation­s a full airing” in order “to provide ample transparen­cy.”

Blumenthal has been an out-front critic of Kavanaugh since President Donald Trump nominated him in July. As a Democrat in the minority, he peppered Kavanaugh in three rounds of questionin­g during confirmati­on hearings two weeks ago.

But neither Blumenthal nor his Democratic colleagues on the committee landed blows sufficient to throw the Kavanaugh nomination off course. Nothing appeared likely to derail Kavanaugh until Blasey Ford, a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, stepped forward to recount how at age 15, she was assaulted by Kavanaugh, then 17, and feared he would “inadverten­tly kill” her.

Blasey Ford recounted that, at a party in Washington’s Maryland suburbs, Kavanaugh was “stumbling drunk” as he pushed her down on a bed, tried to yank off her one-piece bathing suit and put his hand over her mouth to prevent screams.

She told the Washington Post she escaped after a friend of Kavanaugh jumped on them and the three went toppling to the floor, enabling her to lock herself in a bathroom.

Although the incident in question took place in the early 1980s and was relayed months ago to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the senior Democrat on Judiciary, the allegation took on a life of its own Monday.

Republican­s found themselves walking a tightrope between keeping the confirmati­on on track while not appearing insensitiv­e to the complaint.

At least three Republican­s whose votes are critical to confirmati­on — Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz. — said the allegation against Kavanaugh must be resolved before a vote takes place.

Judiciary chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said he wanted to try to resolve the matter through a series of phone calls with both Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford, a process Blumenthal said was inadequate.

“Informal phone calls are no substitute for a full, fair investigat­ion,” he said. “There’s no margin of error for a lifetime appointmen­t to the highest court in the land. So there’s no reason to rush through the investigat­ion to meet an arbitrary Oct. 1 deadline.”

Republican­s had pledged to confirm Kavanaugh by Oct. 1, the first day of the Supreme Court’s 2018-19 term.

Murphy on Monday joined Blumenthal in the fray.

“These are really serious allegation­s,” Murphy said in a statement. “I’ve already made up my mind to vote against Kavanaugh, but for senators who are still undecided or had announced their support for the nomination, there is just no reason to rush this.”

A vote by the GOP-dominated Judiciary committee had been scheduled for Thursday.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., had promised a full Senate vote next week, in time to get Kavanaugh sworn in before Oct. 1. That timeline Monday appeared to have been badly damaged, if not scuttled entirely.

At the White House, Trump praised the 53-yearold D.C. federal appeals court judge for his “outstandin­g intellect,” saying Kavanaugh is “respected by everybody; never even had a little blemish on his record.”

He joined Grassley in criticizin­g Democrats for an allegation “that should have been brought up long before this.”

But he conceded it would take time for the allegation to be resolved. “If it takes a little delay, it'll take a little delay,” he said.

For Blumenthal, Murphy and other Democrats, the leveling of the allegation against Kavanaugh arguably represents their last and best chance to keep the Supreme Court from adding a fifth reliable conservati­ve who could tip the court rightward for a generation to come.

For Republican­s, delays in the confirmati­on process eat up valuable time they don’t have.

Further delays could push the confirmati­on vote past Election Day, raising the prospect that Democratic retaking of the Senate — a longshot at this point — could bring the curtain down on Kavanaugh for good.

Blumenthal declined to directly address the highstakes chess game unfolding over the confirmati­on.

As a senator who declared his opposition to Kavanaugh on Day 1, Blumenthal was among those on the lookout during confirmati­on hearings for misstateme­nts, inaccuraci­es or contradict­ions — anything to offset Kavanaugh’s relatively smooth performanc­e as an earnest, neutral jurist with no hidden agenda.

Whether the allegation against Kavanaugh succeeds where previous lines of attack failed remains to be seen.

“If confirmed, he could be critical in votes that affect real people leading real lives in really destructiv­e ways, for decades to come,” Blumenthal said.

 ?? Alex Brandon / Associated Press ?? Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testifies on Sept. 6.
Alex Brandon / Associated Press Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testifies on Sept. 6.
 ?? Alex Wong / Getty Images ?? U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 13.
Alex Wong / Getty Images U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 13.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States