The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Mueller’s testimony poses risk for Trump, Dems

-

WASHINGTON — Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress will depend not so much on what he says, but that he’s even saying it at all.

For Democrats, the special counsel’s appearance Wednesday creates a moment many have been waiting for: Mueller finally speaking out, piercing the public consciousn­ess about President Donald Trump’s response to the Russia investigat­ion and whether anything should be done about it.

The political stakes are high for Trump, but also for Democrats, who have spent the past two years pushing toward this day. As public attention has drifted and views have hardened, Democrats are counting on Americans hearing what most have not likely read — the stunning findings of Mueller’s 448page report .

“Let us listen, let us see where the facts will take us,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, DCalif. “And then, we’ll see what happens after that.”

Yet there’s a real possibilit­y that Mueller may not bring clarity.

It took months to negotiate his appearance before Congress and he has been reluctant to speak beyond what he and his team wrote. Few bombshells are expected. As the House Judiciary Committee and the House Intelligen­ce Committee gavel in, the buttoneddo­wn prosecutor, once envisioned as a trusted last word, may deliver justthefac­ts responses that leave more questions than answers.

Rather than galvanizin­g public opinion and the questions of impeachmen­t, Mueller’s reluctant appearance may become just another chapter in the Trump era that won’t be closed until the 2020 election.

Trump tried to project a lack of interest, claiming he will not tune in to Wednesday’s hourslong hearings and saying Democrats are “just playing games.”

“I won’t be watching Mueller,” he told reporters.

The nation, though, will likely pay attention.

Mueller’s appearance comes more than two years since the start of the Russia investigat­ion, an extraordin­ary moment in Trump’s presidency when, after Trump had fired FBI Director James Comey, his Justice Department appointed Mueller to take over the inquiry into election interferen­ce and the potential role that Trump and his winning 2016 campaign may have played.

Mueller spoke publicly only once, saying his team’s report, released in April, should speak for itself.

The report found that while there was no evidence the campaign colluded with Russia to swing the election, Trump could not be cleared of trying to obstruct the investigat­ion . But Mueller believed he couldn’t be indicted in part because of a Justice Department opinion against prosecutin­g a sitting president.

The special counsel’s team appeared to punt the question to Congress to decide next steps. More than 80 House Democrats now say there should be impeachmen­t proceeding­s, and it’s likely that Mueller’s testimony increases that number.

While Mueller’s testimony was once envisioned as a crystalizi­ng event, a Watergates­tyle moment to uncover truths, public attention has drifted in the months since the report was released.

Trump, a master at changing the subject, has easily shifted the public’s attention to his racist attacks on four women of color in Congress.

“Timing matters,” said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. He and others who favor opening impeachmen­t proceeding­s say Mueller should have testified months ago.

Democrats are counting on Mueller’s presence to capture public attention in ways the report alone has been unable to do, with some comparing it to the movie version of the book.

“I do think that the contents of the report are so significan­t, and so damning, that when Mr. Mueller brings them to life, and actually tells the American people … it will have an impact,” said Rep. David Cicilline, DR.I., a member of the House Judiciary Committee.

“This will be really the first opportunit­y for the American people to hear directly from Mr. Mueller about what he found about Russian interferen­ce in the American presidenti­al election and efforts by the president to impede, undermine or stop the investigat­ion,” he said.

 ??  ?? Mueller
Mueller

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States