The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

A plan for predictabl­e failure

Same old tribes play Connecticu­t same old tune

- Chief Richard Velky is of the Schaghtico­ke Tribal Nation in Kent. By Chief Richard Velky

Attention City of Bridgeport and Connecticu­t legislator­s: The real reason there is no casino in East Windsor, or in Bridgeport, is because the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes don’t really want another casino in Connecticu­t.

These two tribes have been attempting to play Bridgeport and the state like a onestringe­d ukulele.

Let’s look at the facts. In the mid 1990s the Mashantuck­et Pequot Tribe convinced Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim and then Gov. John Rowland to support their casino proposal for Bridgeport, instead of the proposals from other proven major developers, like Wynn Resorts. The Wynn proposal was valued at $1.3 billion. The Mashantuck­et’s was $500 million — less than half the Wynn proposal. Still, for some reason, the Mashantuck­et got the bid — and as we all now know, Bridgeport got nothing.

In 2004, the Schaghtico­ke Tribal Nation, after decades of hard work, gained federal recognitio­n. We were the third tribe in the state to do so, along with the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes. This recognitio­n would have given the Schaghtico­ke the same rights as the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes, including gaming rights and the same right to build a casino.

One of the locations the Schaghtico­kes was considerin­g at the time was Bridgeport, which sits in the area of the Schaghtico­ke’s historic lands. However, the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes lobbied to have the Schaghtico­ke’s recognitio­n decision reversed, and with the help of then Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, it was.

Of note, this is the first time in the history of the Bureau of Indian Affairs that a reversal had ever been done.

The purported reason for why the the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes lobbied against their own Native Americans was that “Connecticu­t didn’t need a third casino.” Once again, Bridgeport got nothing.

Fast forward to 2017. The state legislatur­e gave the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes an unpreceden­ted “exclusive right” to build a casino off of tribal lands as a “commercial entity.” These tribes chose East Windsor, not Bridgeport.

Next, the state legislatur­e, and thenGov. Dannel Malloy, ignored Attorney General George Jepsen’s warning that this offtriball­and commercial entity could be unconstitu­tional, and would be subject to numerous legal challenges brought forth by other parties. Attorney General Jepsen was correct and the East Windsor project has been on hold for more than two years. Today, East Windsor has no casino, and there is no third casino in Bridgeport or anywhere else in the state. Do you see a pattern here?

Just recently, a bipartisan group of legislator­s who represent southeaste­rn Connecticu­t (host to the state’s two casinos), East Windsor and Bridgeport offered a plan to build a casino in Bridgeport. This proposed “penny arcade” casino would supposedly involve a mere $100 million investment, and would give the Mashantuck­et and Mohegan tribes the exclusive right to operate sports betting and online gaming. Two questions: Do you want those two tribes owning all Connecticu­t gaming? And more immediatel­y, how does that proposal compare with one developer’s proposed $700 million worldclass resort and casino in Bridgeport, instead of a penny arcade?

The answer is clear — not only does the proposed penny arcade proposal woefully pale in comparison to the $700 million project, but it involves the same players who have historical­ly failed to deliver anything more than hollow promises. If this latest proposal goes forward — and fortunatel­y, it appears many officials recognize the potentiall­y problemati­c issues the proposal raises — then the people of Bridgeport, and the entire state, should expect this same old tune to end the way it always has. With nothing. Nothing but years of litigation and lost opportunit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States