The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

State’s failure to adopt tolls is an economic setback

- By Matthew Chudoba Matthew Chudoba, a Danbury resident, is a strategic communicat­ions profession­al.

Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey might have folded a few years ago, but don’t worry Connecticu­t — there’s a new circus in town. It’s called CT2030. With all of the changes the transporta­tion plan has undergone since Gov. Ned Lamont first unveiled it last November, the only reasonable take away we can gather is that the “2030” part of it meant 2,030 different versions.

While the governor’s actions from the past few months certainly resemble “The Greatest Show on Earth,” unfortunat­ely, this is no laughing matter. Said bluntly, Connecticu­t’s failure to adopt tolls statewide is a serious blow to our economic future.

Talk to anyone who studies it for a living — and I did; more on that in a moment — and they will tell you that infrastruc­ture is the key to unlocking economic growth. Cities and states that have top quality infrastruc­ture will be rewarded handsomely in the form of business investment. It’s the magic formula: Companies bring jobs, jobs create income, and income leads to spending.

Thus, it should come as no surprise that several of the states that rank as being the most business friendly are the same ones that get high marks for infrastruc­ture. So, while Texas spends $4.75 billion annually to maintain its roadways, Connecticu­t continues to dance and weave its way around a viable and sustainabl­e plan to fund infrastruc­ture over the long term.

Gov. Lamont gave us a glimmer of hope with his first iteration of CT2030, which called for the implementa­tion of electronic tolls, yet his flip-flopping act that followed would make even the most renowned trapeze artist jealous. It’s almost as if the administra­tion was unprepared for how politicall­y unpopular tolls were going to be, and decided to retreat from the fight, rather than stand its ground.

Let’s go back to Texas for a minute. I spoke with David Perkins, President and CEO of the Texas Aggregates and Concrete Associatio­n (TACA), to find out how the Lone Star state has been able to get Texans to support infrastruc­ture funding (83 percent of voters approved the passage of Propositio­n 7 in 2015, which authorized a constituti­onal amendment for transporta­tion funding) and to get his thoughts on tolling.

In the mid-2000s, the effort began in earnest to push for tolling in Texas because of the realizatio­n that current funding mechanisms just weren’t going to cut it any longer. And as expected, the people revolted. However, to build support, the Texas legislatio­n did something much differentl­y than the Lamont administra­tion. Rather than disappear, it stepped up to the plate to come up with two different funding mechanisms in addition to tolls (Propositio­n 1 and Propositio­n 7), which helped ease some of the resentment over tolling.

“From a policy standpoint, tolling needs to be an option [in infrastruc­ture funding],” Perkins said. “It needs to be a component. It’s a big tool in the toolbox with other tools available to leverage. But there has been pushback,

Cities and states that have top quality infrastruc­ture will be rewarded handsomely in the form of business investment.

and there continue to be some growing pains over tolls especially as the funds from Propositio­n 1 and Propositio­n 7 come into play. It has to be a combinatio­n of tools to make this work effectivel­y in order for the general public to get on board.”

Even with such strong opposition over tolls, the Texas legislatur­e found a way to make the public more receptive to them. Unlike the Lamont administra­tion, Texas refused to let politics stand in the way of passing resolution­s to fund infrastruc­ture. So, it’s no coincidenc­e that as Texas continues to increase the amount it spends on its highways and roads, its labor force follows suit, growing at the equivalent of nearly 1,000 new jobs a day in 2019 (for comparison, Connecticu­t added a total of just 3,600 jobs all of last year!).

While the Lamont administra­tion figures out the next ball to juggle on infrastruc­ture, maybe it ought to take a look at what other states are doing, especially as 5G rolls out across the nation. There’s just no clowning around about this: The ways things currently stand, we are in no position to compete for business investment and tolls are a critical funding source to help shore up Connecticu­t’s economic future. Tolls in Connecticu­t? Now that would be a nice jester.

 ?? Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? A motorists travels underneath I-95 on South State Street in Stamford. Part of the governor's CT 2030 tolling plan was to spend upwards of $20 million renovating a stretch of I-95 in Stamford that travels over Metro-North tracks.
Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticu­t Media A motorists travels underneath I-95 on South State Street in Stamford. Part of the governor's CT 2030 tolling plan was to spend upwards of $20 million renovating a stretch of I-95 in Stamford that travels over Metro-North tracks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States