Palm urges state lawmakers to vote on absentee ballots measure

CHESTER — State Rep. Christine Palm, D-Chester, is leading an effort in the House of Representatives to urge General Assembly leadership to expand absentee ballot provisions.

She said a statutory change is needed to ensure that every Connecticut resident can vote “safely, confidently and legally” in both the upcoming primary and the November general election, according to a news release.

Working with House colleague, attorney and state Rep. Matt Blumenthal, D-Stamford, Palm crafted a letter sent this week to all 151 members of the House, asking them to sign on. In it, the authors call upon both House and Senate leaders to convene a special session in order to vote on amending state statute language that currently allows an elector to vote absentee only if unable to appear at the polls because of “his or her illness,” according to the news release.

The authors believe the statute should be broadened to bring it more in line with the intent of the Connecticut Constitution, which allows absentee voting “because of illness,” Palm said in the prepared statement.

Palm and Blumenthal say a reasonable fear of contracting or spreading COVID-19, and the lack of proven immunity to it, are legitimate reasons for people to stay home on Election Day.

“Given the uncertain trajectory of the pandemic, nothing is more important right now than finding a way to give everyone the option of voting absentee,” she said in the statement. “The state statute governing voting procedures was written long before this epidemic, and needs to be updated to reflect our current reality. It’s our duty to find a way to safeguard both the citizenry’s health and their

right to exercise their civic obligation.”

Blumenthal agreed. “The right to vote is one of the most sacred of American rights, enshrined in both our federal and state constitutions,” he explained in the release.

“He believes keeping the statute as written would, unacceptably, cause ‘disenfranchisement for those forced to choose between their health — and the health of those they love — and their vote,’” he said.

“Where there is disenfranchisement, a grievous wrong is done to the citizen,” he added, quoting the Connecticut Supreme Court.

The General Assembly must, by law, convene to vote on a Deficiency Bill, (a technical budgetary implementation) and the authors feel a vote on state statute should be added to the special session agenda “later this summer or as soon as it is safe to convene,” Palm wrote.

These freshmen legislators said several dozen House colleagues signed on within hours of the letter’s arrival in their in-boxes.

“We are hearing loud and clear the express wishes of our constituents on this matter: that the sanctity of the right to vote, and our democracy, must be protected,” the statement concluded.