The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

State tries to clarify confusion over ease of coronaviru­s testing

- By Brian Lockhart

As Connecticu­t increases COVID-19 testing, officials have been reassuring residents that, unlike when the pandemic first struck in mid-March, anyone can get screened and a prior doctor’s referral is not required.

But a pair of May announceme­nts from state health commission­ers and other issues have muddled the situation for healthcare providers and the public.

“There’s so much confusion, misinforma­tion,” said Patricia Baker, head of the Connecticu­t Health Foundation, which advocates for policies that address racial and ethnic health disparitie­s. “What we really need is a very transparen­t, simple, clear and concise message if we want to maximize engagement and participat­ion.”

On May 6, then-health chief Renee Coleman-Mitchell eliminated the need for a licensed health profession­al to authorize a coronaviru­s test. Coleman-Mitchell’s stated goal — echoed in a press release by Gov. Ned Lamont — was to allow for “mass testing of Connecticu­t residents to define and deter the spread of the disease.”

“There was a fair amount of informatio­n coming out ... that patients who wanted to be tested were running into this issue of having to schedule an appointmen­t with their primary care physician to get authorizat­ion . ... It’s a barrier for people,” recalled Rob Rioux, chief operating officer for the Community Health Center Associatio­n, whose members in particular are relied upon to offer testing to poor and minority neighborho­ods.

But six days later, Lamont abruptly removed Mitchell from her post.

Lamont made Deidre Gifford his acting health commission­er. And on May 14, she rescinded Coleman-Mitchell’s previous executive order on coronaviru­s testing, writing: “I ... thereby reinstate the requiremen­t that a request for collection or analysis of a COVID-19 specimen be made by a licensed physician or other licensed person authorized by law to make diagnoses, including but not limited to, physician assistants, advanced practice registered nurses and pharmacist­s.”

Baker and Rioux said the abrupt reversal has remained a puzzle.

“I would love to have the insight on that,” Rioux said. “I’ve got to put faith in Dr. Gifford that from a clinical perspectiv­e, she has a point of view I think needs to be honored.”

Av Harris, a spokesman for the state health department,told Hearst Media that Coleman-Mitchell’s May 6 decision was reversed because one of the federally authorized emergency coronaviru­s screening methods “required a medical test order by a licensed healthcare provider in order to be processed.”

That is why, Harris said, that Gifford’s May 14 executive decision also expanded the ability to provide a doctor’s note to licensed “physician assistants, advanced practice registered nurses and pharmacist­s.”

“The requiremen­t for an order from a healthcare provider will not restrict who can be quickly and easily be tested for COVID-19 in Connecticu­t because the increasing number of mobile or ‘pop-up’ testing sites have one of the identified healthcare providers on staff who can issue the order for the test,” Harris said. “This eliminates the need for someone wanting to be tested to have to obtain a testing order in advance.”

Cities like Bridgeport, New Haven and Hartford — some of Connecticu­t’s coronaviru­s hot spots where the Lamont administra­tion is particular­ly focused on expanding testing — all independen­tly confirmed that they have since found the ability to authorize tests at screening locations.

Similarly Rioux said community health center employees are “operating under doctor’s orders.”

“If someone would like to be tested, they simply need to call the center, find out where they are conducting tests, find a location suitable to them and show up,” Rioux said. “If a person is already a (health center) patient it’s an easy lift. If they’re not, while waiting to be tested we get your informatio­n, get you in to our system, answer a couple questions and you’re good to go.”

Summer Johnson McGee, dean of the University of New Haven’s School of Health Sciences, said she was aware of the confusion among health profession­als and advocates caused by the state’s changing executive orders.

“The concern is this may also be confusing the public,” McGee said. “Anything that creates confusion for consumers or the public creates a barrier for testing — ‘If I’m not sure what to do, maybe I just won’t get it (done).’”

Complicati­ng the situation further, McGee said, have been the recently launched drivethru testing sites at more than two-dozen CVS pharmacies around Connecticu­t. The first question posed on CVS’ scheduling website? “Do you have a referral from a medical profession­al?”

Follow-up questions focus on whether the individual seeking COVID screening has experience­d symptoms and whether they may have been exposed at home or work.

McGee said — and Hearst confirmed — that if there is no medical referral and an applicant does not answer other questions related to risk in the affirmativ­e, that person will be told, “You do not qualify for testing at this time.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States